Tuesday, April 19, 2011

The Four R's Of Teabaggerism

I have long believed the teabaggers are a dangerous group of people who are far more upset at America having an African-American president than the direction of the country. In fact, the direction they want to take this country is backwards -- to a time when race was a bigger problem and the corporations ruled to the detriment of all American citizens (except the super-rich).

Over at the blog of Jonathan Turley, guest blogger Mike Appleton has written a post on why he believes the teabaggers are dangerous. I think he is right on target, and since I can think of nothing to add to his excellent words, I print here his "Four R's of the Tea Party".

1. It is racist.  I know.  I just played the race card.  But the best way to stop someone from playing the race card is to quit dealing it.  Public expressions of bigotry began as soon as Barack Obama was nominated at the Democratic convention, and continued throughout the campaign, during which prominent Republicans referred to him as “boy,” “uppity” and other vulgarities.  In short order he became a socialist and a Marxist and was then transformed into an extremist Arab Muslim.  Sarah Palin eventually settled on the euphemistic “let’s take our country back,” but we all knew what she meant.  The Tea Party began forming before the inauguration and was printing “Don’t Tread on Me” posters while the Obama family was still unpacking in the White House.  On April 15, 2009, the Tea Party was protesting a tax burden that was, and is, the lowest in 60 years. 


The Tea Party has promoted ugly forms of nativism, including punitive immigration laws,  English only legislation and bans on the teaching of ethnic studies.  It is the 1840s once again, but the targets are Muslims and Hispanics rather than Germans and Irish.


2.  It is a religionist movement.  I don’t know if religionism is a word, but I use it to describe a phenomenon distinct from traditional religion: religion as political philosophy.  It is the view that the Constitution was divinely inspired, that America is God’s gift to mankind, that capitalism is mandated by Holy Scripture and that the notion of “social justice” is the work of the Antichrist.  It is a culmination of the fundamentalist reaction in the early 1900s to Darwin and the progressive movement.  It has spawned a form of Christian imperialism that justifies the “crusades” in Iraq and Afghanistan, supports Israel uncritically and sends American politicians to Africa to lobby for the death penalty for homosexuals. 


3.  It is repressive.  The Tea Party is committed to authoritarianism.  Lawmakers in Congress and throughout the country, particularly in states with heavily Republican legislatures, have been imposing humiliating burdens on women’s constitutional rights at breakneck speed.  They are simultaneously reducing taxes on business  and cutting funding for education and health care.  The regulation of entire industries is being eliminated in certain states.  The integrity of public employees has been impugned and their rights to organize curtailed.  Laws banning the phony threat of sharia are pending in a dozen states.  The independence of the judiciary has been threatened by proposals to reduce courts’ rule-making authority and politicize the judicial selection process.


4.  It is revisionist.  The Christian right and its supporters in legislatures and on school boards have demanded that high school history texts be rewritten to eliminate references to the deism endorsed by many of the Founders in favor of promoting the false notion of America as an exclusively Christian nation.  The history of slavery and the Civil War is being falsified to satisfy the desires of apologists for the Confederacy and southern “values.”   Science cannot be re-written, but it can be denied.  The sciences of climate change and evolutionary processes have become the subjects of unnecessary controversy.

4 comments:

  1. Public expressions of bigotry began as soon as Barack Obama was nominated at the Democratic convention, and continued throughout the campaign, during which prominent Republicans referred to him as “boy,” “uppity” and other vulgarities. [Emphasis added]

    Which "prominent Republicans"? Examples? When? Where?

    To be sure, there have been isolated incidents of racism within the Tea Party, and even one such incident is one too many, but the "racist" screed from the Left has become a self-fulfilling prophecy through the intimidation of any African American courageous enough to participate in the movement. Here's a prime example.

    The Tea Party began forming before the inauguration and was printing “Don’t Tread on Me” posters while the Obama family was still unpacking in the White House.

    I've never seen any evidence that the Tea Party existed prior to Rick Santelli's rant on CNBC on February 19, 2009 calling for such a movement. If you can show me hard evidence to the contrary, I'd be glad to admit I've been wrong.

    It is the view that the Constitution was divinely inspired, that America is God’s gift to mankind...

    Not exactly. From the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence:

    "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." [Emphasis added]

    It's the view that there are certain unalienable rights are endowed not by the divine right of kings, not by noblemen or even by elected officials or by any man, but by a higher power.

    If you don't believe in such a power, then believe in this: No man has given us those rights, and no man can take them away. The Constitution established many of those rights under law, and no senator, congressman, President or Supreme Court justice can take them away without invoking the wrath of the People.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The science ... of climate change [has] become the subject ... of unnecessary controversy.

    So I guess we shouldn't question the UN when it predicted 50 million "climate refugees" by 2010?

    Move along - nothing to see here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow this is a great resource.. I’m enjoying it.. good article

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.