Sunday, January 02, 2022

A Fitting End To 2021


 

COVID-19 Cases And Deaths Are Both Rising

 From The Washington Post:




Stuck In A Loop

Political Cartoon is by Dave Whamond at Cagle.com.
 

A Hope For Our Troubled World


 I thought it would be good to bring in the new year with this quote from Bertrand Russel (from his book "Human Society In Ethics And Politics"):

"I allow myself to hope that the world will emerge from its present troubles, that it will one day learn to give the direction of its affairs, not to cruel swindlers and scoundrels, but to men possessed of wisdom and courage. I see before me a shining vision: a world where none are hungry, where few are ill, where work is pleasant and not excessive, where kindly feeling is common, and where minds released from fear create delight for eye, ear and heart. Do not say this is impossible. It is not impossible. I do not say it can be done tomorrow, but I do say that it could be done within a thousand years, if only men would bend their minds to the achievement of the kind of happiness that should be distinctive of man."

The Cherry On Top

Political Cartoon is by Deb Milbrath.
 

Peace

 

Saturday, January 01, 2022

Happy New Year


I wish all my readers a very Happy New Year! I hope it is a good year for you -- full of love, luck, and prosperity! 

The Legendary Betty White Is Gone

 

Fear Rises Of The Year 2022

The chart above is from the new Axios / Momentive Poll -- done between December 14th and 16th of a national sample of 2,602 adults, with a 2 point margin of error. 

It shows that people have an increasing fear of 2022.

Ball Drop

Political Cartoon is by John Darkow in the Columbia Missourian.
 

Vaccine Refusal Is Not Based On Christianity


Millions of Americans are refusing to take the vaccine for COVID-19. They (mainly white evangelicals) are claiming a religious exemption, because that is usually the only exemption honored. But refusing to take the vaccine has no real religious base -- it is purely a political move.

Here is part of what Michael Gerson says about this in The Washington Post:

White evangelical Christians have resisted getting vaccinated against the coronavirus at higher rates than other religious groups in the United States. Some initial resistance came in the context of a familiar ethical debate: Did the creation of coronavirus vaccines involve cell lines produced from aborted fetuses?

The short answer is: no. A slightly longer answer is that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is grown in fetal cell line PER.C6, which was derived from an elective abortion in 1985. “But contrary to social media claims,” Francis Collins, former director of the National Institutes of Health, told me, “there are no fetal cells or fetal DNA in the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.” The Vatican has indicated that Catholics can take the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

“The Pfizer and Moderna mRNA are synthesized without the need for a cell line,” Collins said. “The only possible objection against those is that their effectiveness was tested in certain lab experiments that used fetal cell lines. But if that is sufficient reason to decline them, that would also need to apply to a very long list of current medicines, including aspirin and statins.”

The main resistance of evangelicals to public health measures does not concern abortion. Having embraced religious liberty as a defining cause, they are now deploying the language of that cause in opposition to jab and mask mandates. Arguments crafted to defend institutional religious liberty have been adapted to oppose public coercion on covid. But they do not fit.

More than that, the sanctification of anti-government populism is displacing or dethroning one of the most basic Christian distinctions. Most evangelical posturing on covid mandates is really syncretism, a merging of unrelated beliefs — in this case, the substitution of libertarianism for Christian ethics. In this distorted form of faith, evangelical Christians are generally known as people who loudly defend their own rights. They show not radical generosity but discreditable selfishness. There is no version of the Golden Rule that would recommend Christian resistance to basic public health measures during a pandemic. This is heresy compounded by lunacy.

It is worth recalling, as a matter of law, that someone does not need a good or theologically coherent religious-liberty claim to make a religious-liberty claim in court (absent fraud or opportunism). To deny such a claim, government needs a compelling interest advanced in the least restrictive manner. But it is hard to imagine a clearer, more fundamental example of a compelling state interest than preventing the spread of a virus that has already taken the lives of more than 800,000 Americans.

And when Christians are asserting a right to resist basic public health measures, what is the actual content of their religious-liberty claim? The right to risk the lives of their neighbors in order to assert their autonomy? The right to endanger the community in the performative demonstration of their personal rights?

This is a vivid display of the cultural and ideological trends of a warped and wasted year. It just has nothing to do with real Christianity.

History Through Rose-Colored Glasses

Political Cartoon is by Eric J. Garcia.
 

The Rich Make Laws For The Poor To Follow