Friday, May 11, 2007

Post Office Lets Time Warner Write Its Rules

It looks like the Bush administration is still letting the big corporations call the shots, to the detriment of America's citizens. The U.S. Post Office is getting ready to institute a plan drawn up by Time Warner. This plan would give Time Warner and other big magazine conglomerates discount rates, while radically raising the rates on smaller magazines.

It sounds like the Post Office is letting themselves be used as a pawn so the big magazines can get rid of their smaller competition. But Timothy Karr says it better than I could, so I reprint below the letter I received from Free Press last night.


Dear Media Reformers,


The U.S. Postal Service is about to implement a massive hike in its rates for magazines that would put diverse and free speech at risk.

Postal regulators have decided to adopt a plan that favors the nation's largest publishers, like Time Warner and Hearst, while unfairly burdening thousands of smaller and independent magazines with much higher postal rates, as high as 20 or 30 percent.

The plan to give Big Media lower rates was submitted by Time Warner, the nation's largest publisher. We were stunned when postal regulators chose the Time Warner plan -- with little apparent hard research on how the plan would affect small publishers -- instead of another proposal made by the Postal Service itself that would have imposed an equal increase on all publishers.

If implemented, the Time Warner plan could push many smaller publications to the brink of bankruptcy.

America's founding fathers understood that the First Amendment would be worth little without a postal system that encouraged broad public participation in America's marketplace of ideas. To ensure that a diversity of viewpoints were available to "the whole mass of the people," they created affordable postal rates that gave smaller political journals a voice.

The rate increase reverses this egalitarian ideal. It threatens the democratic discourse that our founding fathers fostered through the U.S. mail system.

Please join us in urging postal regulators and Congress to convene public hearings, investigate how these rate increases were decided in what seems to be an unfair and unorthodox way, and reverse the ruling.

With your help, we can stop this decision and restore the postal system that has served free speech in America so well.

Thanks for all you do,

Timothy Karr
Campaign Director
Free Press
www.freepress.net

1 comment:

  1. In doing so, he violated Bush's travel restrictions to Cuba.[Emphasis added]

    Truth check: Michael Moore was cited under 31 C.F.R. Part 515, Section 515.201(b); and 31 C.F.R. Part 501, Section 501.602.

    The former was enacted on July 7, 1963 and last amended August 25, 1997. The latter was enacted August 25, 1997 and last amended October 8. 1997.

    If you're going to lay the blame on a U.S. president, then call them Kennedy's and/or Clinton's travel restrictions to Cuba.

    Personally, I think it's Castro's fault myself.

    Here are links to my supporting documentation (I wish I knew how to make these open in new windows):

    the letter to Michael Moore from the Treasury Department;

    31 C.F.R. Part 515 Section 515.201(b); and

    31 C.F.R. Part 501, Section 501.602

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.