Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Perry Hid Report And Pressured Committee

A couple of weeks ago, Texas governor Rick Perry replaced several members of the Texas Forensic Science Commission (TFSC). This happened just days before the commission was to meet and consider the case of executed inmate Cameron Todd Willingham.

Three separate investigations involving nine of the nation's top arson experts had concluded the original investigation was deeply flawed, and Willingham was most likely innocent of the crime he was for which he was executed. It was expected the TFSC would issue a report saying the executed man was innocent. It would be the first time a state agency in Texas admitted an innocent man was executed.

At the time, many progressive bloggers (including myself) accused the governor of shaking up the commission to delay the report and cover up his own involvement in the execution of Willingham. Since then, evidence has surfaced that shows the blogger accusations were well-founded.

We now know the governor received a report from fire experts showing the evidence used to convict Willingham was faulty, and that he was very probably innocent. Perry ignored the new evidence and allowed the man to be executed. At the current time, Perry and his aides are refusing to release this report. They claim the report he received is not a "public record".

How could a report submitted to the governor about a pending execution, including the comments of state employees (his aides and advisors) about the report, not be considered a part of the public record? Could it be because the governor is trying to hide the fact that he allowed an innocent man to be executed so he could pander to his right-wing death penalty-loving base of voters?

It's now become apparent that the governor replaced members of the TFSC because he could not pressure the commission into helping him cover up the fact that he was willing to trade an innocent life for votes. Samuel Bassett, ex-TFSC chairman, said he was summoned twice to meetings with Perry's top attorneys, where he was told the governor did not like the direction their investigation was taking.

Bassett said, "I was surprised that they were involving themselves in the committee's decision-making. I did feel some pressure from them, yes. There's no question about that."

Do we really want a governor that would allow the execution of an innocent man and try to pressure a state commission to help him cover it up, and then replace the members of that commission when they determine to do their duty? He has successfully delayed the commission's report, but hopefully it won't help in his cover-up.

The story is out now, and you can expect to hear a lot about it in next year's campaigns.

1 comment:

  1. Keep this stuff tucked away in a handy place for when Perry makes his inevitable run for the White House.

    Allowing an innocent man to be executed for political gain? *That* should be a capital crime.

    Actually, there shouldn't be any capital crimes, but if there are going to be, what Perry has done should one.

    Is that too harsh? Perhaps, one of my reasons for opposing capital punishment is that honest mistakes can be made, jeopardizing innocent lives.

    And there is nothing "honest" about what Perry has done.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.