Saturday, November 28, 2009

Statement On Children's Rights


A few days ago, I wrote a post on children's rights. It told about how the United States is the only country in the entire world that has not ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child. This treaty is an effort to guarantee basic rights to all of the world's children.

Yesterday, I got an excellent comment on the post from someone named Patsky in the United Kingdom. This comment explained the need for all nations, including the United States, to ratify this treaty (and he/she explained it far better than I did). I thought the comment was so good that I have reprinted it as a post for you to read. Here it is:


I work to promote children's rights in the UK and it's important to know that, even in economically and politically stable nations such as ours, there's a very long way to go before children will have the same access to their rights for protection, provision and participation as are available to adults.

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) interprets the 1948 Universal Declaration on Human Rights as it should be applied in the special case of children whose journey between wholly dependent infancy and independent adulthood means that, for a greater or lesser period between birth and age 18, they must rely on others for their physical, financial and emotional security.


The UNCRC identifies each nation's responsibility to ensure that human children have access to what they need in order to develop as effective human beings. It covers basic physical needs - such as access to food and water (challenges that we might appear to have dealt with in the developing world, although some children's rights thinkers have begun to look at the levels of salt and sugar in western children's diet as evidence that nation states are not sufficiently protecting and providing for children in this regard). Some other rights are to education, play, family, services, safety from harm and - most controversially (and most centrally) - to be consulted and to have their views taken seriously.

All of the rights laid down in the UNCRC address basic human needs. They are not about 'wants'. In the case of rights to education, for instance, they do not involve any child's 'right' to eg a place at private school or to be taken to school in the car by their parents. What they involve is a child's right to an education that enables their personal human development now and in the future - and there is room for improvement in any society for that.

As I understand it (and I am no expert on this at all), the US has always taken the view that its own policies sufficiently uphold children's rights. It's quite clear that this cannot be the case when children are imprisoned and physical punishment is enabled by the state (both these things are also true in the UK and the latter is the area that I specifically work to change). There will be myriad other examples.


Somalia is, of course, a completely unstable state. The UNCRC has been ratified by many such states who, from the evidence of how they mistreat their adult population will most certainly be contravening children's rights. But the fact that they have ratified the convention means that there is at least some way for the UN to monitor children's experiences and to hold these nations to account. This information informs NGOs who work in these difficult circumstances and will enable them to better target their resources.

Of course, such UN monitoring is just the intervention that the US has always shied away from. But, if the US accepts its responsibilities in terms of human rights, then it must accept the same for children and join the family. I guess it's up to folk like yourself to press for that, and to send President Obama a clear message that change in this area is also needed.

As a final comment, children's rights in the US have often been dismissed because they would weaken parents' rights. But the point about human rights is that every individual holds the same rights; they complement each other and pull gently against one another. They constitute the ultimate in give and take. So parents' rights and children's rights should be regarded as working together.

Good luck over there.


I am thoroughly ashamed that the United States has not ratified this treaty, especially in light of how much we preach human rights to the rest of the world, and I believe other decent Americans are equally ashamed. I will continue to post periodically on this subject until the United States comes to its senses, and I urge you to write President Obama and those in Congress to stop delaying and ratify the Convention on the Rights of Children.

It is the right thing to do.

5 comments:

  1. (From Patsky as was - worked out how to get my full name out there.)

    It it's any help, I've just done a quick search for US organisations that advocate for children's rights and which may already have useful pathways for contacting the President on children's rights issues. But it's a tough job. The Children's Rights Council (http://www.crckids.org/) sounds perfect, but when I looked at the web content, it became clear that the council's agenda is an entirely adult one, promoting the benefits for children of two-parent families.

    The Children's Defense Fund (http://www.childrensdefense.org/),is more interesting, though it again has a largely adult agenda (seeing children as victims who need adult help) and doesn't mention rights at all (or, at least, not that I could see during a quick surf). Nothing that I could see about children's competence to advocate for themselves - oh, and lots of faith-based stuff, towards which you will obviously feel warmly.

    I spent about 30 mins looking for something more satisfying, but there was nothing that looked like the Children's Rights Alliance for England, the central children's rights organisation over here: http://www.crae.org.uk/

    I guess that's something of an indication of the mountain you have to climb over there.

    ReplyDelete
  2. its totally disgusting that we haven't signed it...

    ReplyDelete
  3. This recent research report published by the Pentagon shows that more than 75% of our American youth between the ages of 17-24 are unfit for military service due to poor education, lack of physical and mental fitness and criminal activity.

    http://cdn.missionreadiness.org/NATEE1109.pdf

    I do not consider that the needs of these young people have been met at any other level than pitiful! This reports shows in its statistics, for example, that the state of Texas with a total combined population of 20 million has over 2 million of these malfunctioning youth!

    The research findings pouring out of our Center for Disease Control about the life long severe consequences of child abuse and trauma clearing show the link between infant-child maltreatment and every social problem our society faces.

    http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/ACE/


    http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/ACE/

    http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/ace/pyramid.htm

    http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:CdPWisAdRAQJ:www.acestudy.org/files/AR-V1N4.pdf+cdc+ace+study+research&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

    We do not need to be concerned with the Universal Rights of Children because we would rather pretend that they have no rights at all.

    Great going, America! We're not getting any smarter with age.

    Visit my blog on resolving intergenerational trauma including severe child abuse at:

    http://stopthestorm.wordpress.com/

    ReplyDelete
  4. Really intelligent entry to read on.. I am truly compelled with this article. Looking forward for more info.


    piwa povyshayuwaya potenciyu

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is a big pleasure to visit your blog and to enjoy your excellent articles here. I like that very much. I can feel that you paid much attention for those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. I can be very good reader & listener. Appreciate your work!

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.