David Grisham is a self-appointed preacher (and unemployed security guard). He is also the leader of a tiny organization called Repent Amarillo. He and his few followers have received national news coverage for trying to burn a Quran (he failed) and for a YouTube video showing them shooting a blow-up Santa doll (he thinks Santa is a heathen). They have also picketed (and threatened) community people, bands, and organizations they think are "sinful".
Recently, Grisham (pictured) became a candidate for mayor of Amarillo. Several national blogs and others got upset at this. They seemed to think that in an area as conservative and religious as the Texas Panhandle Grisham would actually have a chance of winning the city election. They need not have worried. While Amarillo is a very red area (and very religious), it is not filled with people as insane as Grisham.
That city election was held yesterday, and Grisham finished in tenth place out of eleven candidates. He could not even get 100 votes (and you know his followers all went to the polls). In a city of nearly 200,000 people that's a pretty pitiful showing. In fact, the transgendered woman who ran for mayor got about four times as many votes as Grisham did. You know that has to chap his bigoted butt!
Here are the results of the mayoral election:
Paul Harpole...............11,428 (77%)
(establishment candidate)
Roy D. McDowell...............1,867 (13%)
Sandra Dunn...............387 (3%)
(transgendered candidate)
Drew Alexander...............300 (2%)
Steve Dawson...............221 (1%)
Jim Brokenbek...............141 (1%)
Rodney Johnson...............125 (1%)
Ryan Vigil...............116 (1%)
Grady Traves...............104 (1%)
David Grisham...............98 (1%)
(Repent Amarillo nut-job)
William Jean...............23 (1%)
So anyone who was worried that Grisham and his Repent Amarillo cohorts were some kind of growing social movement can rest easy. They are far closer to social outcasts, and the election has exposed just how tiny and ineffectual they really are. They basically had their heads handed to them by the people of Amarillo.
In other election news, it looks like the city's monied establishment had a very good night. Their candidate, Paul Harpole, won the mayor's race easily with about 77% of the total vote. I can't say that was unexpected since there really wasn't a strong candidate in the field to oppose him.
I was disappointed in the "single member districts" proposition outcome though. Amarillo is far too large to still be electing city commissioners at-large, but the proposition to create single-member districts was badly defeated (11,116 to 3,517). The establishment had run TV commercials with the mayor saying property taxes would double if single-member districts were created. It was a lie and made no sense, but evidently the scare tactic worked. It looks like it's going to take a court order to get this changed and spread the political power to all parts of the city.
And of course, the election was held on electronic voting machines with no paper trail. So there's no way to know if the votes were counted as cast (and no way to do a recount). That needs to be changed. It'll probably have to take a court order to change that too, since the Republican city leaders see no problem with it (because they control it).
I was one of the 3,517 who voted for single member districts. To me, the worst argument against the proposition was the ad that said that Amarillo has had at-large members since 1913. It totally ignored the fact that a lot of things have changed since then (Prohibition, Jim Crow), why shouldn't this too, if it's a change for the better?
ReplyDeleteFor a split second in the booth, I almost voted for Grisham for mayor (just for the fun of it; I knew he couldn't possibly win), but in the end, I voted for Harpole. I liked his ideas on fighting graffiti.
I've felt the need to elaborate on my thought processes.
ReplyDeleteI had already decided to vote for Harpole before I reached the polling place. Looking for his name on the ballot, I saw Grisham's name just above Harpole's, and I thought, "Oh wow, I forgot he's running!" My split-second thought kind of a "F*** you-screw with the system" reaction. Childish, I know - but that was my reaction. Fortunately, reason prevailed, or else Grisham would have been one vote closer to 100.
In retrospect, I wonder how many of the votes he got were people who succumbed to the same reaction I had.
Santa, being part of Norse mytholog, technicaly is a heathen. From a judeo-christian perspective of course.
ReplyDeleteI was one of the 3,517 who voted for single member districts.
ReplyDeleteDetroit here we come.
Santa, being part of Norse mytholog, technicaly is a heathen. From a judeo-christian perspective of course.
ReplyDeleteSanta (aka Saint Nicholas) is actually a Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox saint who lived in what is now Turkey in the 4th Century.
Detroit here we come.
ReplyDeleteIs Detroit the only place where there's geographical representation?
Imagine a Texas legislature in which all Texans voted for at-large representatives and senators. Who would get the lion's share of representation? The Metroplex and Houston, that's who. It's hard enough for the Panhandle even with representatives and senators from this part of the state.
Or what would a U.S. Congress look like if all Americans voted for all senators and congressmen? Cities like L.A., New York, and yes even Detroit, would has a disproportionate say in the makeup of Congress.
Imagine a Senate consisting of 100 Chuck Shumers, or a House consisting of 435 Maxine Waters (Waterses?).
(he thinks Santa is a heathen)
ReplyDeleteSanta (aka Saint Nicholas)
Santa definetly was not St. Nick. And St. Nick was Greek living in a place that today is Turkey.
I wont get into the habit of the Roman Empire as far as absorbing the culture of those conquered or how, after the morph, the Roman Chatolic church continued in that light.
Instead please google Santa+Norse. Practically all things Christmas, besides Christ, is in fact Norse.