Friday, June 29, 2012

Understanding The Individual Mandate

The above graphic seems entirely appropriate for Americans understanding the ramifications of Obamacare -- especially the individual mandate. Watching the news today (in light of the Supreme Court's approval of Obamacare), it became obvious to me that most people simply don't understand the individual mandate. I watched person after person talk against the individual mandate, and the crazy part was that the mandate would not even apply to most of those people.

Quite a few Americans seem to think the mandate will apply to them (and most other Americans), and that Americans who are already having trouble making ends meet in this terrible economy, will have to come up with more money (money they don't have) to pay the individual mandate (or its tax penalty). That is simply not true. It's time for a little education about the individual mandate, and just who would be affected by it. Here are some of the facts:

* The individual mandate will only affect between 2% to 5% of the American population. That means between 95% to 98% of the population will NOT be affected by Obamacare's individual mandate. And it could be even less than that. Last year in Massachusetts (which has a very similar mandate), the penalty for failing to comply with that mandate only applied to 1% of the state's population.

* The people listed below will NOT be affected by the individual mandate:

* People will also not be affected if they have insurance coverage by one of the following:

* Even among the tiny percentage of the population that will be affected by the individual mandate, the federal government will pay all or part of the required insurance for people making up to 400% of the federal poverty level. That 400% level is currently about $44,680 for a single person, and $92,200 for a family of four. People above those levels will not get government help. The help will be on a sliding scale, with those making less getting more government help.

As you can see, the individual mandate is not really an onerous requirement. It won't even apply to nearly all Americans, and for the few it does apply, care is taken to give help to those people needing it. As this provision kicks in and people see what it is really all about, I believe most people will accept it. Especially since this one provision will help keep their insurance costs down more than any other single thing.

The Republicans will be busy between now and election day referring to the mandate as a new tax on Americans. I don't have any problem with them calling it a tax (since failure to cooperate will result in a small tax liability). But those of us who understand the individual mandate is an integral part of the success of Obamacare, need to make sure that everyone understands that this "tax" will apply to only a tiny portion of the total population. Most people don't need to worry about it at all.

2 comments:

  1. Well done, Ted, you, at least, have realised that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an on-coming express train!

    Roberts' judgment is masterly. He keeps his beloved court out of the political no-man's-land but ensures that Obamacare and the new "tax" to be paid by at least 4 million Americans (but not the poor or the wealthy!) will be the subject of a non-stop barrage of Republican attack ads. The confusion, and fear, in the mind of the public will be even greater than you were wise enough to spot.

    How well will those 23 Dem/Independent Senate seats do? And if both Houses fall to the Republicans, how long before Obamacare is voted out?

    In addition, the Commerce Clause is now finished as a means of governmental bullying, and also, the government now has no means of forcing States to accept Federal funds in exchange for expanding Medicaid rolls.

    The Dems would be well advised to note the old Afghan vet saying - it ain't over 'til you step on the IED!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Most of the misinformed watch FOX and read red-state blogs. Remember, these media sources support the GOP agenda of making Obama a one-term president. You don't achieve this by being objective

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.