There are many reasons why a woman might choose to have an abortion (such as saving her own life or the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest), but one valid reason is overlooked by some -- the fact that being forced to have a baby could subject poor women to a life of abject poverty. This is especially true these days, when social programs are being cut to the bone.
It very well could mean the difference between being able to work out of poverty, or being forced to remain poor for the rest of her life. And the sad fact is that the same people who want to force a woman to have a baby are the same ones who want to cut any kind of financial help for that woman when she has a baby. This shows they are just playing political games, because if they truly cared for children they would support efforts to insure all children have a healthy life full of opportunity.
In this country, which is rife with economic inequality, having an abortion may well the the only sane choice a woman has.
Here is what Lucy Stein has to say about this in a post for the Texas Research Institute:
A new report released last month by the Reproductive Health Technologies Project clearly outlines an obvious connection too often ignored in the politically-charged discourse surrounding access to comprehensive reproductive health care: abortion access is an economic issue. The report opens with this obvious — but sidelined — reality: “There is likely no decision that has a greater economic impact on a woman’s life than having—or not having—a child.”
While policy agendas geared toward promoting women’s economic security are gaining traction in progressive discourse, access to reproductive health care, including abortion and birth control, is conspicuously but consistently missing from this list of proactive agenda items. Though these other economic equality issues — equal pay, minimum wage, affordable child care, pregnancy accommodations, and paid family and sick leave — are absolutely critical, access to comprehensive reproductive health services is as fundamental to advancing women’s economic security. And polling shows that people understand that access to abortion should be part this conversation.
The report’s findings illustrate the inextricable link between abortion access and economic security:
- Most women who seek abortion are already struggling financially.
- The most commonly cited reasons for seeking an abortion are financial concerns.
- Many women cannot afford the cost of an abortion.
- Women often make great sacrifices to obtain the money needed for an abortion.
- Economic barriers delay abortion care.
- Later abortion poses a higher financial burden.
- Financial barriers can be a complete obstacle to abortion care for some women.
- Women denied an abortion are more likely to be in poverty two years later.
Given that low-income women are more likely to seek abortion and are disproportionately affected by anti-abortion regulations that restrict access—coupled with the fact that approximately 1 in 3 women will have an abortion in her lifetime and that the majority of women who have abortions are already mothers—it’s past time we integrate reproductive healthcare into comprehensive women’s economic security agendas. Ideologically-driven policies that shutter abortion clinics and slash family planning funding have left Texas women and families without the healthcare they need to thrive economically.
Pro-life equals..... Pro-fetus anti-woman anti-child pro-death anti-contraceptives religious bigotry Pro-control of uterus by non-women and even more laws based on BS religious/dogma/moral beliefs to control others especially poor minorities.
ReplyDelete