Yale University Professors' Letter To Judiciary Committee

The Senate Judiciary Committee (controlled by Republicans) seems determined to push through the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court -- in spite of revelations that he attacked a 15 year old sexually (and lied about it). The committee has refused to ask the FBI to investigate the charge (as has been done in the past). Evidently, they are afraid an investigation will prove the charge to be true.

Many professors at Yale University (Kavanaugh's alma mater) think the committee is being unfair. And they have written a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Here is the letter the 50 professors wrote:

As the Senate Judiciary Committee debates Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, we write as faculty members of Yale Law School, from which Judge Kavanaugh graduated, to urge that the Senate conduct a fair and deliberate confirmation process. With so much at stake for the Supreme Court and the nation, we are concerned about a rush to judgment that threatens both the integrity of the process and the public’s confidence in the Court.

Where, as here, a sexual assault has been alleged against an individual nominated for a lifetime appointment in a position of public trust, a partisan hearing alone cannot be the forum to determine the truth of the matter. Allegations of sexual assault require a neutral factfinder and an investigation that can ascertain facts fairly.  Those at the FBI or others tasked with such an investigation must have adequate time to investigate facts. Fair process requires evidence from all parties with direct knowledge and consultation of experts when evaluating such evidence. In subsequent hearings, all of those who testify, and particularly women testifying about sexual assault, must be treated with respect.

The confirmation process must always be conducted, and appointments made, in a manner that gives Americans reason to trust the Supreme Court.  Some questions are so fundamental to judicial integrity that the Senate cannot rush past them without undermining the public’s confidence in the Court. This is particularly so for an appointment that will yield a deciding vote on women’s rights and myriad other questions of immense consequence in American lives.