Trump and the Republicans were perplexed when American voters rejected them in the recent election. They bragged about the "great economy", and were sure that the economy would save them in the election. They were obviously wrong (since over 53% voted for Democrats, and only 45% for Republicans). Why did this happen? After all, a good and growing economy normally helps the party in power in elections.
The reason is that the "great economy" was only helping a small percentage of Americans -- the rich. Most Americans are not getting a share of the growing economy -- and they know it. The charts above can help explain what is happening.
The top chart shows the growth of weekly worker wages (in constant dollars). Note that while the rich and corporations are enjoying record incomes and profits, it is not being shared with workers. In the last decade, worker wages have barely risen. And the second chart shows that the gain in wages is is not real. Although the wages rose somewhat, the amount of goods and services that wage will buy has not risen. In other words, workers are no better off than they were many years ago. The third chart shows where the money is going. While the workers share of the nation's income has dropped sharply, the business share of that income has risen. Increased productivity is not being shared with workers (as it once was).
This is due to the Republican economic policy which favors the rich. They still seem to believe that if the rich are given more (as in the recent tax cut), that will benefit everyone. It doesn't. Nothing "trickles down" from the rich to everyone else.
But it gets worse. Not only does the failed GOP policy benefit only the rich, but it sets the economy up for disaster. These same policies led to the Great Depression, and the Great Recession -- and it soon could lead to another economic crash (at least as bad as the one in 2007, and maybe as bad as 1929).
Here is how former Labor Secretary Robert Reich describes it on his blog:
Sorry to deliver the news, but it’s time to worry about the next crash.
The combination of stagnant wages with most economic gains going to the top is once again endangering the economy.
Most Americans are still living in the shadow of the Great Recession that started in December 2007 and officially ended in June 2009. More have jobs, to be sure. But they haven’t seen any rise in their wages, adjusted for inflation.
Many are worse off due to the escalating costs of housing, healthcare, and education. And the value of whatever assets they own is less than in 2007.Which suggests we’re careening toward the same sort of crash we had then, and possibly as bad as 1929.
Clear away the financial rubble from those two former crashes and you’d see they both followed upon widening imbalances between the capacity of most people to buy, and what they as workers could produce. Each of these imbalances finally tipped the economy over.
The same imbalance has been growing again. The richest 1 percent of Americans now takes home about 20 percent of total income, and owns over 40 percent of the nation’s wealth.
These are close to the peaks of 1928 and 2007.
The underlying problem isn’t that Americans have been living beyond their means. It’s that their means haven’t been keeping up with the growing economy. Most gains have gone to the top.
But the rich only spend a small fraction of what they earn. The economy depends on the spending of middle and working class families.
By the first quarter of this year, household debt was at an all-time high of $13.2 trillion. Almost 80 percent of Americans are now living paycheck to paycheck.
It was similar in the years leading up to the crash of 2007. Between 1983 and 2007, household debt soared while most economic gains went to the top. If the majority of households had taken home a larger share, they wouldn’t have needed to go so deeply into debt.
Similarly, between 1913 and 1928, the ratio of personal debt to the total national economy nearly doubled. After the 1929 crash, the government invented new ways to boost wages – Social Security, unemployment insurance, overtime pay, a minimum wage, the requirement that employers bargain with labor unions, and, finally, a full-employment program called World War II.
After the 2007 crash, the government bailed out the banks and pumped enough money into the economy to contain the slide. But apart from the Affordable Care Act, nothing was done to address the underlying problem of stagnant wages.
Trump and his Republican enablers are now reversing regulations put in place to stop Wall Street’s excessively risky lending.
But Trump’s real contributions to the next crash are his sabotage of the Affordable Care Act, rollback of overtime pay, burdens on labor organizing, tax reductions for corporations and the wealthy but not for most workers, cuts in programs for the poor, and proposed cuts in Medicare and Medicaid – all of which put more stress on the paychecks of most Americans.
Ten years after the start of the Great Recession, it’s important to understand that the real root of the collapse wasn’t a banking crisis. It was the growing imbalance between consumer spending and total output – brought on by stagnant wages and widening inequality.
That imbalance is back. Watch your wallets.
No comments:
Post a Comment
ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.