Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Perfect Metaphor For Texas GOP's Failure
And if the Republican state government gets its way, a good portion of rural Texas will return to those bad old days. Those Republicans have been so stingy with state funds in recent years (so they could give the rich and the corporations unneeded tax cuts) that most state agencies are now underfunded, and unable to adequately meet the needs of Texas citizens -- from education to medical care to mental health to help for the poor and disadvantaged, and in many other areas.
And the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) has not been immune to the cuts. This agency, responsible for the upkeep and building of roads and bridges in the state, doesn't have the money to adequately complete its mission. So, to save money, they are now preparing to remove the asphalt paving from many rural roads, and replace it with a layer of gravel. They say they just can't afford to fix the potholes in those roads.
Currently the plan is to turn 80 miles of paved roads in six Texas counties (Live Oak, Dimmit, LaSalle, Zavala, Reeves, and Culberson) into gravel topped roads. But if they get away with that (without too much political flack), you can bet the plan will soon involve many more counties and many more miles of rural Texas roads.
Much of the damage to these roads (which the state says it can't afford to fix) is being done by the movement of heavy oil and gas equipment. These oil and gas companies should be paying to fix some of the damage they are causing, but the very thought of that is anathema to the Republicans in state government. They believe taxes should be paid by working folks -- not by corporations or rich people. And they would rather tear up paved roads (and deny other services) than make the rich and the corporations pay an adequate share of state taxes.
The Republicans claim that Texas is an economic "miracle", but that is far from the truth. It leads the nation in the number and percentage of minimum wage no-benefit jobs, the number and percentage of uninsured people, the number of high school drop-outs, and the lack of adequate services for its citizens -- so corporations and the rich won't have to pay taxes. Texas is really an economic disaster -- and the TxDOT plan to turn paved roads into gravel roads is a perfect metaphor for that.
Monday, July 08, 2013
Is It Art Or Is It Advertising ?
Playboy did pay for the sculpture to be made and placed near Marfa (which is known for its art community). But they say the two sculptures are art, not advertising (and therefore don't need any permit). This brings up an interesting question. What is art, and where is the line that divides it from advertising? Some artists, like Andy Warhol, didn't believe there was a difference -- and his reproductions of Campbell's soup cans have been recognized as art. If an image of Warhol's famous painting was put up beside the road, would TxDOT consider it an advertisement?
Does the fact that Playboy Enterprises paid for the sculpture to be made and erected make it an advertisement? Would it be art if Playboy Enterprises didn't pay for it? A case could certainly be made that the sculpture is an iconic symbol in our culture (just like the Campbell's soup can), and could be used to make an artistic statement (such as a statement about sexuality in our society).
I have to disagree with TxDOT. I think both sculptures are art. But then I live in Amarillo, only a couple of miles from Cadillac Ranch (a recognized work of art featuring 10 Cadillacs buried nose-down in the ground). TxDOT has not said that Cadillac Ranch is an advertisement for Cadillacs -- why not? What is the difference between those Cadillacs and the bunny sculpture? Aren't both iconic symbols of our culture? And what about the giant cross erected in the Panhandle? Couldn't that be considered an advertisement for christianity?
What do you think? Is the bunny sculpture art or advertising? What is the difference?
----------------------------------------
Here are the images I reference in the above post -- Cadillac Ranch, the Warhol painting, and the huge cross in Texas Panhandle. Art or advertising?
Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Tx Senate - Incompetent Or Sneaky ?

The Texas Legislature meets only once every two years for a 140-day session. That session ended this last weekend, and once again, it more closely resembled a convention of second-rate clowns than anything else. It reminds us why the people of Texas don't have the stomach or nerve to ask for yearly legislative sessions.
This year the Texas House and Senate adjourned before approving and funding the operations of at least three state agencies -- the Texas Racing Commission, the Texas Department of Insurance and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Texas has a system that includes "sunset laws". That means that each state agency must be reviewed every few years and reapproved, or it automatically ceases to exist.
Some may disagree, but I think the state could get by for a couple of years without the Racing Commission and the Department of Insurance. All you have to do is look at insurance rates in Texas to know that the latter department did very little for Texas consumers anyway. But do away with TxDOT? That seems a little extreme, especially considering the condition of Texas' overcrowded and crumbling highway infrastructure.
Although they didn't pass the regulation bill re-approving TxDOT, the Texas House did pass a last-minute resolution that would have allowed the agency to operate for another two years. But that wasn't good enough for the Senate. A majority of the senators then worked themselves up into a lather and decided to teach the House a lesson. They adjourned without approving the resolution.
Even Governor "Good Hair" Perry didn't see the logic in that. He said, "If I could tell you I understood what happened last night, I would be an absolute genius. I thought I was watching an episode of 'Lost' for a moment. I have no idea what they were thinking or why they didn't want to pass the resolutions that would have given a safety net for those agencies."
There are two options as to what happened. The Texas Senate is either incredibly incompetent or very sneaky. The first option cannot be ruled out since the huge majority of the senators are Republicans, but I have a suspicion that the truth lies with the second option.
You see, the Republicans spent a large part of the session trying to pass a voter suppression bill (which they called the Voter ID bill). The Republicans know the political winds are currently blowing against them. They have only two choices -- moderate their views and appeal to a broader range of voters or suppress as many votes as possible. These right-wing nuts chose voter suppression.
The voter suppression bill easily passed the Republican-dominated Senate, but was killed in the House (where there are 76 Repubs and 74 Dems). The only hope to revive the bill is to force the governor to call a "special session" of the legislature. That is why the Senate refused to pass the resolution to keep TxDOT alive for another two years. If they had passed it, there would be no reason for a special session to be called.
So don't be surprised when the governor calls for a special session to save TxDOT. And don't be surprised when a voter suppression bill is added to the special session agenda. That's what this whole mess is about.
Come to think of it, maybe they're sneaky AND incompetent.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
TxDOT Apologizes To Senator
Wendy Davis won her seat in the Texas Legislature last November, and is currently serving her first term. A couple of weeks ago, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) finally got around to putting up signs directing the public to her office on West Seventh in Fort Worth. The signs directed citizens to the office of State Rep. Wendy Davis.The signs looked good, but Ms. Davis is not a state representative -- she's a senator. Yesterday, TxDOT finally got the signs corrected. A spokeswoman from TxDOT apologized to Ms. Davis for the error, and said, "It was purely an accident. We are aware she’s a senator, and we appreciate her service."
Fortunately for TxDOT, Senator Davis has a sense of humor. She said she's just glad she doesn't have two jobs in the legislature. She told Politex blog, "I’ve got my agenda full enough on the Senate side."
Tuesday, February 03, 2009
A Republican Making Sense ?
I think it's become obvious to anyone who drives that TxDOT has let our Texas roads fall behind where they should be. There are many roads and bridges in bad need of repair, and in some areas, the roads just aren't capable of handling the ever increasing traffic. Both parties know something has to be done -- the question is what.The governor and most of his Republican cronies thought they had the solution a few years ago. They wanted to turn many roads over to private companies who would build new toll roads or turn existing roads into toll roads. The highlight of this plan was the boondoggle called the Trans-Texas Corridor. The only problem was they forgot to ask Texans what they wanted, and they quickly found out Texans don't want private companies building toll roads.
Our governor would still like to build the private toll roads. He just wants to do it slower and more secretively -- maybe do it in smaller pieces and under the people's radar.
Frankly, this is the most expensive way for Texas motorists (and the most lucrative for his corporate buddies). It would be cheaper for everyone to just raise the gas tax and build free roads, but few legislators in Austin have the political courage to do that (from either party).
However, it looks like at least one legislator is trying to do the right thing, and surprisingly, he is a Republican -- Senator John Carona of Dallas. Carona has just sent a letter to his colleagues in both houses with a proposal that could put Texas on the right path, or at least make a start down that path. His proposal is to:
* index the motor fuel tax so it increases with inflation (this may be the only way to raise the tax until the legislators grow a spine).
* make TxDOT a more efficient agency with fewer employees.
* get TxDOT to raise funds by fully levering its debt capacity.
* minimize toll roads & private partnerships.
* amend Tx Constitution to prevent diversion of transportation funds to other uses.
Now I'm not crazy enough to believe this proposal will solve all our road problems, but it is a hell of a lot better than building private toll roads. It is a start -- a step in the right direction.
Wednesday, February 06, 2008
TxDOT Lies Are Exposed

Monday, February 04, 2008
Texans To Choose New License Plate

Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Hearings To Begin On Trans-Texas Corridor

Thursday, September 27, 2007
TxDOT Running Out Of Money ?

Friday, September 21, 2007
Lawsuit Filed Against TxDOT

Monday, September 10, 2007
Krusee Disingenuous About TxDOT Spending

Several TxDOT division directors, engineers from Beaumont and Amarillo, Executive Director Steve Simmons and Perry aide Kris Heckmann will be receiving the public relations training. They will then go forth to try and convince the people of Texas that the TTC and other tolls roads should be built and turned over to private companies.
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
TxDOT Might Allow Electronic Billboards

Saturday, February 24, 2007
Tx-DOT Lied About Trans-Texas Corridor
State auditors examined the contract with Cintra-Zachary, and Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) actions regarding the Trans-Texas Corridor. What they found is not good. The auditors said that TxDOT had underplayed the costs of building the TTC and overplayed the benefits of the TTC to Texas. They also chided TxDOT for refusing to release parts of the contract with Cintra-Zachary in a timely manner.
It seems that the contract guarantees the Spanish company a 12% profit margin and gives Cintra-Zachary control of the TTC for the next 50 years. If the foreign company does not make its 12% profit, then the state of Texas would be responsible for making up the difference. Considering the exorbitant rates it would cost for motorists and truckers to drive on the TTC (up to 45 cents a mile), it is reasonable to believe that few would be able to afford the drive, thus causing Texas taxpayers to make up the difference.
Auditors also addressed the supposed benefits to be derived from the building of the TTC. Texans have been told that the Spanish company would be paying the state of Texas around $3 billion for the right to build this boondoggle. Now we learn from the auditors that if interest rates and inflation are higher than expected, these expenses would be deducted from the $3 billion, perhaps reducing it to NOTHING!
So, TxDOT and TTC supporters want us to let a foreign company build the TTC and own it for at least 50 years. They want Texans to guarantee them a 12% profit for those 50 years. And for all this, Texas will probably receive absolutely nothing. The people who came up with this idea are either complete idiots, or they have been paid off.
Senator Kirk Watson said, "Texas cannot rush into a project that will help define our future when there are so many uncertainties about the present. We must step back, demand answers, and (ensure) the public is protected before the work proceeds on the Trans-Texas Corridor."
I would go further. The TTC is a bad deal for Texas. It should not be built at all.
Thursday, December 28, 2006
State Pays 31 Cents To Collect 25 Cents In Tolls
Last month, they started collecting tolls on the new toll road just north of the DFW metroplex -- Texas 121. The new toll road does not have collection booths. If you don't have a toll tag, the system just takes a picture of your license plate and then mails you a bill. I guess this might work out for people who drive a good distance, but what about those who drive only a short distance on the toll road?
Recently, 72-year old Don Ferguson received his bill from TxDOT for using the toll road -- it was a bill for 25 cents. The problem with this is that it cost the state 30.8 cents to mail the bill, and Mr. Ferguson is not the only person this has happened to. Several people have complained of receiving a 25 cent bill in a metered envelope costing 30.8 cents to mail, including TxDOT spokesman Mark Ball. When these people pay their fee, the state of Texas will have lost nearly 6 cents on each transaction.
Just think, what if most drivers on Texas 121 go only a short distance? Could the state actually lose more in postage than it collects in fees? Even worse, is this the level of competence we can expect on other toll roads being planned?




