Sunday, January 11, 2009

Gupta Is Not A Good Choice

When I first heard that Barack Obama wanted Sanjay Gupta to be his Surgeon General, I didn't care one way or another. Like most Americans, all I knew about Gupta came from seeing him sporadically on CNN and he seemed likable enough. But the more I learn about him, the less I like his appointment.

One of the major problems with his appointment is his view of national healthcare. It has become clear to anyone that will look that our healthcare system is a disaster. Not only are we the only industrialized nation in the world that does not cover all of its citizens with health insurance, but we have somehow wound up taking medical decisions out of the hands of doctors and left these life and death decisions up to insurance executives.

Anyone who has dealt with an insurance company in the last few years, knows how difficult it is to deal with them. They always will put their ever-growing profit margin ahead of a consumers healthcare. It has become obvious that America needs a government-run singler-payer system that gives citizens the choice of doctor and hospital, and puts medical decisions back in the hands of doctors.

But Gupta likes the status quo. During the election campaign, he came out in favor of the sadly inadequate McCain plan, which would leave our healthcare decisions in the hands of private insurance companies. He also made this clear when he attacked Michael Moore's excellent movie about healthcare called Sicko. He accused Moore of "fudging his facts" in the movie. Of course, it turned out that Gupta was wrong and Moore's facts were correct.

Now there has come to light another very disturbing belief of Gupta's. It turns out that he is a believer in and supporter of "facilitated communication" (FC). FCis the belief that non-communicative autistic patients can communicate througn a keybord and computer. A "helper" holds the patients hand over a keyboard, and supposedly a patient is able to type out a message. It is nothing more than a scam.

Every time FC has been scientifically tested, it fails miserably. It is junk science that's being passed off as real science, and the last thing we need is a Surgeon General supporting this pseudo-science.

I'm beginning to think Sanjay Gupta would do more harm than good if allowed to become Surgeon General.

5 comments:

  1. I agree with you whole-heartedly on this. Now, I want to be honest with you, I've always been "anti-Obama". Not because of his race, but because I live in Illinois and he was my Senator and I saw nothing more than a Daley machine political hack who did nothing but take credit for other people's accomplishments. But when he made this appointment, I he even shocked me. I'm surprised that he didn't ask Dr. Phil, that wouldn't surprise me in the least from the looks of many of his appointments so far.

    With the push for awareness about Autism in the United States being so successful, I thought we would finally have the opportunity to find more ways to understand and help these children. This guy just looks for whatever is headline news and goes with it. Sure, he likes the status quo...it's made him rich and famous, why should he want to change it?

    I wonder how long it will be before Obama appoints Oprah Winfrey to a cabinet post?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I absolutely agree. I read his last book and it was junk. He is definitely a don't rock the boat insurance/FDA apologist.

    ReplyDelete
  3. jobsanger,
    Now that you've reconsidered the Gupta appointment, might you also be having second thoughts about Caroline "Y'know" Kennedy for appointment as, y'know, junior senator from New York?

    Aside from being the last surviving member of Camelot, the editor of a collection of her mother's favorite poems, and a pretty accomplished fundraiser, what are her qualifications?

    I know she's eligible (> 30-years-old; citizen > 9 years; inhabitant of New York state), but eligibility isn't the same thing as qualifications. If it were, both my nephews would be "qualified" to be the next senator from New York. Both are over 30 (one is 35, the other is 31), U.S. citizens since birth, and unlike Ms. Kennedy, both were born in New York state (no carpet baggers they).

    What if the leading contender's name was Caroline Schlossberg (which is, in fact, her married name) and you didn't know anything about her political pedigree? Would you still be so excited about her appointment?

    Our forefathers broke away from Great Britain because they believed that "all men [and women] are created equal" regardless of their station in life. Special privileges based on family name are anathema to the spirit of this country.

    Based on your logic, you could say that Pierce Bush (nephew of the 43rd president) will be "qualified" to be a U.S. Senator in 2018.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, I still think Caroline Kennedy would make a great senator, and she still has my whole-hearted support.

    As for your nephews, they do meet the qualifications to be senator, but I would need to know more about them before supporting them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. They're both dyed-in-the-wool liberals, just like their father (my brother).

    In the spirit of full disclosure, I have to admit that my younger nephew is current living in Connecticut, and the older one resides in Philadelphia, PA. However, I'm sure they'd consider moving back to the Empire State if you'd support their candidacies.

    I know their professional backgrounds are totally irrelevant to you (as witnessed by your support for Ms. Schlossberg), but the older nephew is an assistant district attorney, and the younger one is a art museum curator.

    Too bad neither of them are named Roosevelt - or Clinton. :)

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.