The United States Supreme Court makes some mistakes every now and then. The Dred Scott decision was a bad mistake, which history later corrected. The court decisions, especially the 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, that give corporations the same right as people in the United States was another mistake.
RESOLUTION - CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT |
Whereas, the founders of our nation proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence authored by Thomas Jefferson that government is founded only on the consent of the governed; and |
Whereas, we proudly embrace this founding premise of democracy; and |
Whereas, we cherish the belief articulated by Abraham Lincoln that our forebears intended to establish a government of, by, and for the people that shall not perish from the earth; and |
Whereas, our forefathers and foremothers made monumental sacrifices to ensure they preserved our nation's democracy so they could hand it down to us for our benefit and enjoyment; and |
Whereas, the United States Supreme Court recently held in the Citizens United v. Federal Communications Commissiondecision that corporations are "persons" under the Constitution, thus possessing the same Constitutional rights and protections as natural, living human beings; and |
Whereas, the Supreme Court ignored the plain fact that corporations are artificial entities which do not have the natural capacity to give or withhold the consent of the governed or to participate in government of, by, and for the people; and |
Whereas, the Supreme Court majority of five judges that made this ruling subverted the very concept of democracy for which so many of our forefathers and foremothers have sacrificed so much; and |
Whereas, the Supreme Court majority of five judges that made this ruling subverted the democratic political process by removing all effective limitations on the pernicious flow of massive corporate money into election campaigns; and |
Whereas, the intellectual dishonesty of the Supreme Court ruling is demonstrated by the fact that the Constitution on its face does not give corporations the rights of persons yet the five judges who made the ruling claimed to be strict constructionists in their confirmation hearings; and |
Whereas, since the Supreme Court majority purported to base its ruling on Constitutional interpretation it will require amendment of the Constitution to overrule the Court's decision; and |
Whereas, amendment of the Constitution is a proper and time-honored method for the people to overrule Supreme Court decisions of erroneous Constitutional interpretation; and |
Whereas, the Constitutional amendment process contains checks and balances to ensure that the Constitution is not amended lightly and should only be done for the most pressing of reasons; and |
Whereas, equating corporations to natural persons is so fundamentally damaging to our democracy that it is now imperative to amend the Constitution to clarify that corporations are not Constitutional persons; and |
Whereas, only by such Constitutional amendment will the people regain the right to regulate and limit corporate behavior by such legislative action as the people may desire through their legislative representatives, including but not limited to time-honored prohibitions on corporate spending in political campaigns; now |
Therefore be it resolved, that the following amendment to the United States Constitution should be adopted by the U.S. Congress and submitted to the states for ratification without delay: |
No comments:
Post a Comment
ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.