Showing posts with label blogs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blogs. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Honored By A Fellow Blogger

One of my fellow political bloggers has bestowed the Sunshine Award on me. And I consider it a real honor since it comes from a writer and blog that I read regularly and have a lot of respect for -- Larry at Woodgate's View. The award is given by a blogger to other bloggers that inspire their work, and it is truly humbling to think I can inspire the work of others.

But the honor comes with some rules. I'm supposed to reveal 10 things about myself, and pass it on to as many as ten other bloggers who inspire me. So, here goes:

Favorite Color -- It has to be green, the color of life.
Favorite Food -- Texas Chili, nothing is better (and let me say that real chili does not contain beans, carrots, or sugar).
Best Moment -- Actually four equal best moments, the births of my four children (3 girls, 1 boy).
Worst Moment -- Being shot in the stomach by a carjacker in September 2005, and coming within minutes of dying.
Age -- Let's just say I qualified for Medicare on my last birthday.
Favorite Condiment -- Salsa Picante, and I am addicted to the stuff.
Passionate Belief -- The idea that all people have worth and deserve equal rights.
Favorite Sports Team -- Dallas Cowboys, hands down.
Education -- B.S. in Social Sciences from Texas Wesleyan University.
Religion -- I have been an atheist for nearly 40 years.

Now for the bloggers that I wish to honor. I list them in no particular order. They are all regular reads of mine, and they all bring a bit of sunshine to my life and help to keep me honest and relevant (and they represent a range of sexes, races/colors, ages, and sexual preferences). The names of their blogs are:

Brains and Eggs
Texas Liberal
Yellowdog Granny
Redeye's Front Page
GrannyStandingForTruth
Under The Mountain Bunker
Lesbians In My Soup
Parsley's Pics
On My Mind
Random Musings
A Sane Break From The Insanity

And yes, I know that's 11 blogs. I've always had a problem following rules.

Tuesday, July 06, 2010

Are Amateur Political Blogs Dying ?


"Only five years ago, the progressive political blogosphere was still predominately a gathering place for amateur (that is, unpaid or barely paid) journalists and activists unattached to existing media companies and advocacy organizations. Those days are almost completely over. Now, the progressive blogosphere is almost entirely professionalized, and inextricably linked to existing media companies and advocacy organizations."

Those are the words of Chris Bowers on the blog Open Left. He says the progressive blogosphere has become professionalized and there is no place left for the amateur political bloggers. He blames this on three developments:

1. Established media companies and advocacy organizations hiring bloggers to blog full-time.
2. Previously amateur progressive blogs have become professional organizations (meaning they are making enough money to hire full-time staffs).
3. Bloggers have translated blogging into consulting and advocacy work.

He goes on to say:

"Add up all three of these paths, not even to mention the emergence of the utterly dominant Huffington Post, and the progressive political blogosphere is now both thoroughly professionalized and integrated into the progressive media an political ecosystem.

That didn't take very long. The progressive blogosphere really first emerged onto the political scene in late 2002 over fights like the run up to Iraq, the 2003 Democratic primaries, and Trent Lott's comments at Strom Thurmond's 100th birthday party. In less than eight years, it went from a loosely knit, rag-tag network of amateur outsiders into a fixture in the world of professional political advocacy and media.

RIP to the amateur progressive blogosphere. It provided a regular feeling of revolutionary ecstasy while it lasted, but there was no way it could last very long. It was a transitional period into a new media and political paradigm, not a new paradigm unto itself."

What an unmitigated load of horse manure! Although it is undeniable that some of the biggest bloggers have become professional, started writing for the mainstream media, or are hire themselves out as consultants, this is by no means the bulk of the many progressive bloggers (the huge majority of which meet his definition of "amateur"). But Bowers seems to think that since a few progressive bloggers are now making a lot of money there is no need anymore for the amateurs (the rest of us).

Personally, I question what all that money coming in has done to the integrity and independence of thought these bloggers once had. Many have toned down their progressivism and moved toward the center to keep the money coming in or to increase the volume of money coming in. I'm not saying they've become the enemy, but I do wonder if they've not reported a story or not said something because it might hurt their "revenue stream". Once you become professional you have to worry about things like that (and that is one complaint I have against the mainstream media).

In fact, I do not consider many of these blogs to be a real part of the progressive blogosphere anymore. They have now become a part of the mainstream media, and they act like it. They have a bottom-line to worry about and can no longer say what they want regardless of the consequences.

Check out my blogroll to the right. You won't find any of these professional blogs anymore. That's because I don't trust them any more than I do the mainstream media. The bloggers I list may run a few ads on their blog but they are a long way from making a living out of blogging. When they say something it is because that is what they honestly believe and when I think that is no longer true they will disappear from the blogroll. It is not because they were paid to say it or toned down their opinion to keep from losing advertising revenue.

That is also why this blog does not accept paid ads. If you see an organization advertised on this blog, it is because I like that organization enough to push it free of charge. I have never made a penny off this blog and have turned down several requests to run paid advertisements. Because of that the reader can be sure he/she is getting my honest opinion (whether they agree with it or not).

I don't begrudge another blog for trying to make a little money, but it is silly for a blogger who is making a lot of money to consider him/her self more important than the bloggers who do not blog for a living (but only for their passionate beliefs). The fact is that only a tiny portion of progressive bloggers make enough money to be considered professional, while there are thousands of amateur political blogs.

The day of the amateur political progressive blogger is far from over. These are the blogs I go to when I want to know what other progressives are thinking, and many other people do the same. I can understand why the professionals want to discount the amateurs because that would give them more readers and more say, but the most honest and vibrant voices of progressivism are still to be found on the amateur political blogs.

I personally find Bowers' attempt to marginalize the amateur progressive blogs to be distasteful and a disservice to the progressive movement. Are amateur political blogs dying out? Not at all. They are alive and well and will last as long as ordinary American citizens have an opinion and the courage to reveal that opinion. I hope and expect that will be for a long time to come.

Friday, May 04, 2007

Army Tries To Restrict Free Speech


One of the things that makes the Iraq war different from wars in the past is the internet. No longer do people have to depend on the Main-stream Media outlets for their information. The internet has given those on both sides of Bush's war a way to get their opinions out to the people.

One of the most interesting aspects of this, especially as it pertains to the Iraq war, has been the blogging by active duty soldiers and National Guard. For the first time in history, ordinary citizens can hear and read what the soldiers who are fighting the war actually think about it. In the past, the people were only told what government leaders wanted them to hear.

At first, the war was popular with many, including our soldiers, so the U.S. Army didn't mind their soldiers blogging as long as they didn't give away any military operational secrets. For their part, soldiers have been very good about not giving away any secrets. After all, they don't want to do anything to hurt their fellow soldiers.

But as the war began to drag on with no end in sight, and we learned more about Bush's lies to start it in the first place, the American people began to oppose the war more and more. Soldiers also began to question just why we remain in Iraq, and this questioning began to take the form of opposition to the war on many of their blogs.

The soldiers have not given away any military secrets, but evidently the U.S. Army is unhappy with their opposition to Bush's war. As more and more soldier blogs begin to voice this opposition, the army is beginning to crack down on soldier blogs. It looks like the army only supports free speech when you agree with Bush.

In April, the U.S. Army issued new rules regarding blogging by soldiers. According to the new directive, soldiers must now consult with their immediate supervisor AND another officer in charge of "operational security" before they can do any of the following:

*Post anything on a website or blog.
*Enter discussions on information forums or message boards.
*Send e-mail that may be published in a public forum.

In other words, the U.S. Army is trying to shut up those soldiers brave enough to tell the truth about the war. They know that the words of our soldiers are very powerful in shaping public opinion. They also know that the more Americans learn about the truth of Bush's war, the more they oppose that war.

The army is wrong on this issue. Even though Bush would like to restrict our freedoms, we do still live in a free country - and for a country to remain free, it must protect free speech. Just because a soldier dons his uniform and bravely fights as instructed, does not mean that he no longer has a brain or no longer has a right to free speech.

The army has a right to ask soldiers not to reveal military secrets, but a soldier's personal opinion of Bush's war is not a military secret. They should be free to express their views just like any other American.