I agree with all those Americans who only gave this buffoon a single term. Does he seriously believe that allowing a government to rip money off people on the entirely spurious grounds that, 'honestly, folks, cross our hearts and wish to die, we will be helping the poor and not politically sympathetic pressure groups, nor building up our own salaries and pensions'? If he does believe that then he was and still is unfit to run a village council because he neither understands Christianity or economics.
I take it all back! Yes, folks, I was wrong, Jimmy Carter is a wise and judicious man, if only once in every 50 years:
“I think the jury made the right decision based in the evidence presented because the prosecution inadvertently set the standard so high that the jury had to be convinced that it was a deliberate act by Zimmerman and that he was not defending himself and so forth,” Carter told television station WXIA in Atlanta. “It’s not a moral question, it’s a legal question and the American law requires that the jury listens to the evidence presented.”
Well done, Sir, couldn't have put it better myself!
ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.
I agree with all those Americans who only gave this buffoon a single term. Does he seriously believe that allowing a government to rip money off people on the entirely spurious grounds that, 'honestly, folks, cross our hearts and wish to die, we will be helping the poor and not politically sympathetic pressure groups, nor building up our own salaries and pensions'? If he does believe that then he was and still is unfit to run a village council because he neither understands Christianity or economics.
ReplyDeleteGo, JImmy! The way so many alleged Christians are acting the last couple decades, it makes me even more happy that I am NOT one.
ReplyDeleteI take it all back! Yes, folks, I was wrong, Jimmy Carter is a wise and judicious man, if only once in every 50 years:
ReplyDelete“I think the jury made the right decision based in the evidence presented because the prosecution inadvertently set the standard so high that the jury had to be convinced that it was a deliberate act by Zimmerman and that he was not defending himself and so forth,” Carter told television station WXIA in Atlanta. “It’s not a moral question, it’s a legal question and the American law requires that the jury listens to the evidence presented.”
Well done, Sir, couldn't have put it better myself!