She makes my 'O'Hair' stand on end! What a total dipstick! She doesn't specify which religion but, presumably, lumps them altogether under one label. And perhaps she thinks the sort of "reason" that will save us all is, say, dialectical materialism. Go ask the former Gulag occupants how well that worked for them!
She does lump all religions together -- and she is right about that. But where the hell do you get the idea she believed in "dialectical materialism"? Do you have any proof? Or did you just make it up to slander her? You right-wingers need to stop throwing out accusations that have no basis in fact. It just makes your own argument look weak and silly.
Excuse me! That silly woman lumped all religions together so why shouldn't I lump all together the many daft theories that so-called 'reason' has come up with over the ages? And even if I was 'slandering' her (which I wasn't) why should she be allowed to 'slander' me without reply?
There is nothing "anti - human, -women, -life, -peace, -reason or -science" in the words of that Jewish preacher from 2,000 years ago. What fallible men made of his words is another matter.
First, she was not talking about what the "Jewish preacher" said 2,000 years ago -- but the way religion is forced or imposed on others in this world (the way religion is practiced). And the truth is that most (if not all) religions are anti-woman, anti-life, anti-peace, anti-reason, and anti-science. If they don't teach this, they certainly practice it.
And lumping all non-religious people into the category of being marxists is just silly (and you know it). Some are, but others subscribe to other ideologies (even conservatism).
Discussing with David is like seeing your words sucked into a deep black hole of ignorance. And if she did not, then I will, cuz I have read the BS thrown out by the 'Jewish preacher from 2,000 years ago' so yes he goes into the pile as well. And although Buddha's stuff is better in many ways, his fan club ha also distorted his teachings and made a pile of BS out of them too. And show me where the 'Jewish preacher from 2,000 years ago' said treat women with respect and if they need an abortion then OK or do not make war on each other, do not own slaves, if your husband is beating you then get a divorce or just wash your hands after a crap.
ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.
She makes my 'O'Hair' stand on end! What a total dipstick! She doesn't specify which religion but, presumably, lumps them altogether under one label. And perhaps she thinks the sort of "reason" that will save us all is, say, dialectical materialism. Go ask the former Gulag occupants how well that worked for them!
ReplyDeleteShe does lump all religions together -- and she is right about that. But where the hell do you get the idea she believed in "dialectical materialism"? Do you have any proof? Or did you just make it up to slander her? You right-wingers need to stop throwing out accusations that have no basis in fact. It just makes your own argument look weak and silly.
ReplyDeleteExcuse me! That silly woman lumped all religions together so why shouldn't I lump all together the many daft theories that so-called 'reason' has come up with over the ages? And even if I was 'slandering' her (which I wasn't) why should she be allowed to 'slander' me without reply?
ReplyDeleteThere is nothing "anti - human, -women, -life, -peace, -reason or -science" in the words of that Jewish preacher from 2,000 years ago. What fallible men made of his words is another matter.
First, she was not talking about what the "Jewish preacher" said 2,000 years ago -- but the way religion is forced or imposed on others in this world (the way religion is practiced). And the truth is that most (if not all) religions are anti-woman, anti-life, anti-peace, anti-reason, and anti-science. If they don't teach this, they certainly practice it.
ReplyDeleteAnd lumping all non-religious people into the category of being marxists is just silly (and you know it). Some are, but others subscribe to other ideologies (even conservatism).
Discussing with David is like seeing your words sucked into a deep black hole of ignorance.
ReplyDeleteAnd if she did not, then I will, cuz I have read the BS thrown out by the 'Jewish preacher from 2,000 years ago' so yes he goes into the pile as well. And although Buddha's stuff is better in many ways, his fan club ha also distorted his teachings and made a pile of BS out of them too.
And show me where the 'Jewish preacher from 2,000 years ago' said treat women with respect and if they need an abortion then OK or do not make war on each other, do not own slaves, if your husband is beating you then get a divorce or just wash your hands after a crap.