Perhaps he is, perhaps he isn't, but what does that make the Feds who spent a *$1million* of your money setting up a small army complete with helicopters and snipers which they then disbanded! The Grand Old Duke of York lives again:
Oh, The grand old Duke of York, He had ten thousand men; He marched them up to the top of the hill, And he marched them down again.
And when they were up, they were up, And when they were down, they were down, And when they were only half-way up, They were neither up nor down.
...and if his name were Benitez instead of Bundy, liberals would be hailing him as an "undocumented rancher." We are either a nation of laws, or we are not. If Bundy and his supporters think the grazing fees are unfair, they should lobby to change them (or do away with them altogether). But that shouldn't exempt him from the fees he's already incurred. Likewise, if those who are illegally in this country and their supporters think that our immigration laws are unfair, they should lobby to change them. But that shouldn't exempt those here illegally from the laws they have broken. If we grant amnesty to the latter, shouldn't we do the same for the former? Or do our laws apply only to the rich and not the poor, only to the politically incorrect and not to the politically correct?
ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.
A-hole
ReplyDeletePerhaps he is, perhaps he isn't, but what does that make the Feds who spent a *$1million* of your money setting up a small army complete with helicopters and snipers which they then disbanded! The Grand Old Duke of York lives again:
ReplyDeleteOh, The grand old Duke of York,
He had ten thousand men;
He marched them up to the top of the hill,
And he marched them down again.
And when they were up, they were up,
And when they were down, they were down,
And when they were only half-way up,
They were neither up nor down.
...and if his name were Benitez instead of Bundy, liberals would be hailing him as an "undocumented rancher." We are either a nation of laws, or we are not. If Bundy and his supporters think the grazing fees are unfair, they should lobby to change them (or do away with them altogether). But that shouldn't exempt him from the fees he's already incurred. Likewise, if those who are illegally in this country and their supporters think that our immigration laws are unfair, they should lobby to change them. But that shouldn't exempt those here illegally from the laws they have broken. If we grant amnesty to the latter, shouldn't we do the same for the former? Or do our laws apply only to the rich and not the poor, only to the politically incorrect and not to the politically correct?
ReplyDelete