A common libertarian argument is that conservative policies make us worse off because we have't gone all the way. So the 2008 crash wasn't because of a lack of regulation but because there were still some regulations. It's the same thing here. America won't be safe until everyone is armed. And when that is accomplished it will be necessary for everyone to also have a flamethrower.
I like Heinlein's solution (Revolt in 2100???) Where all people either carry a gun or a bright shoulder patch. Patch =law follower and non-violent. Any one with a gun is allowed to challenge anyone else with a gun to a duel and kill without punishment. BUT... if a shoulder patch person is shot EVEN BY ACCIDENT the killer is executed. After a short time all bad gun users are dead, and the rest are in small numbers. Win-Win....the nonviolent are protected by the state, and the gun nuts are killed off.
ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.
A common libertarian argument is that conservative policies make us worse off because we have't gone all the way. So the 2008 crash wasn't because of a lack of regulation but because there were still some regulations. It's the same thing here. America won't be safe until everyone is armed. And when that is accomplished it will be necessary for everyone to also have a flamethrower.
ReplyDeleteI like Heinlein's solution (Revolt in 2100???) Where all people either carry a gun or a bright shoulder patch. Patch =law follower and non-violent. Any one with a gun is allowed to challenge anyone else with a gun to a duel and kill without punishment. BUT... if a shoulder patch person is shot EVEN BY ACCIDENT the killer is executed. After a short time all bad gun users are dead, and the rest are in small numbers. Win-Win....the nonviolent are protected by the state, and the gun nuts are killed off.
ReplyDelete