We are living in the age of "punditry". It seems like all the news organizations currently make use of so-called "experts" (pundits) to explain the political or economic news to the general viewing public. Frankly, I don't think most of these pundits know much (if any) more than the people who are watching them.
Well, some scholars at Hamilton College wondered if many of these people really knew what they were talking about, so they decided to find out. They looked at a good sample of print and TV pundits and determined the accuracy of their predictions. Then they divided them into three categories -- the good, the bad, and the ugly. The good were right more times than a coin flip would have been right, the bad were about as good as if you had just flipped a coin, and the ugly were wrong so many times that flipping a coin would have been better than listening to them.
Each of the following pundits is given a prognosticator score ( the number of wrong answers subtracted from the number of right answers and divided by the number of predictions then multiplied by 10 - the higher the score, the better the prognosticator). They also have a political score (from 1 to 9 with the 1 being conservative and the 9 being liberal).
It doesn't surprise me that they found the most reliable of all the pundits was Paul Krugman (Pulitzer Prize winner in economics and NY Times columnist). The guy is usually right on target in my opinion. Here is the list:
The Good
PAUL KRUGMAN
political...............7.90
prognosticator...............8.2
right 15 out of 17 times
MAUREEN DOWD
political...............7.20
prognosticator...............7.3
right 9 out of 11 times
ED RENDELL
political...............6.20
prognosticator...............7.0
right 15 out of 20 times
CHUCK SCHUMER
political...............7.30
prognosticator................6.9
right 11 out of 13 times
KATHLEEN PARKER
political...............3.30
prognosticator...............6.7
right 4 out of 6 times
NANCY PELOSI
political...............7.70
prognosticator...............6.3
right 20 out of 27 times
DAVID BROOKS
political...............3.80
prognosticator...............5.8
right 13 out of 19 times
EUGENE ROBINSON
political...............6.90
prognosticator...............5.5
right 7 out of 11 times
HANK PAULSON
political...............2.56
prognosticator...............5.5
right 16 out of 22 times
The Bad
NEWT GINGRICH
political...............1.50
prognosticator...............3.5
right 13 out of 23 times
MIKE HUCKABEE
political...............1.90
prognosticator...............3.0
right 6 out of 10 times
HOWARD WOLFSON
political...............7.30
prognosticator...............2.8
right 11 out of 18 times
JOHN KERRY
political...............7.20
prognosticator...............2.5
right 7 out of 12 times
BOB HERBERT
political...............8.50
prognosticator................2.2
right 4 out of 9 times
ANDREA MITCHELL
political...............5.20
prognosticator...............2.2
right 9 out of 18 times
THOMAS FRIEDMAN
political...............6.00
prognosticator...............2.0
right 5 out of 10 times
DAVID BRODER
political...............4.70
prognosticator...............1.8
right 5 out of 11 times
CLARENCE PAGE
political...............7.30
prognosticator...............1.7
right 2 out of 6 times
NICHOLAS KRISTOF
political...............6.80
prognosticator...............1.7
right 6 out of 12 times
GEORGE WILL
political...............2.50
prognosticator...............0.8
right 18 out of 48 times
HILLARY CLINTON
political................6.90
prognosticator...............0.0
right 3 out of 6 times
The Ugly
SAM DONALDSON
political...............3.40
prognosticator...............-0.8
right 7 out of 25 times
CARL LEVIN
political...............7.20
prognosticator...............-1.1
right 3 out of 9 times
JOE LIEBERMAN
political...............4.00
prognosticator...............-1.2
right 6 out of 17 times
LINDSEY GRAHAM
political...............2.50
prognosticator...............-3.4
right 13 out of 41 times
CAL THOMAS
political...............1.50
prognosticator...............-8.7
right 1 out of 15 times
NOTE -- If a person hedged on a prediction, then that was not counted in figuring score.
No comments:
Post a Comment
ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.