Thank you for your recent polls, they cheer me up immensely. All the indicators are that the Dems will be slaughtered in November - oh dear, what a pity, never mind!
Off topic, suddenly you don't seem to have much to say about the Ferguson shooting. Perhaps because all the initial reports are now being shown up as the crude, dishonest, Sharpton-style 'agit-prop' everyone with more than three brain cells suspected they were. I suspect that the grand jury will concur!
1. I think the Democrats will have a good night on election day.
2. There's no much more to say about Ferguson. It was a police murder followed by a military-style police repression. That is obvious to anyone who honestly looks at the facts.
3. Will the policeman get off? Probably. He was White and his victim was Black, and juries in America have a hard time believing any white policeman can be wrong (especially if the victim is a Black man). It's not right, but there's still a LOT of racism in this country.
"Dr. Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist in San Francisco who also reviewed the documents, concurred that the autopsy “supports the fact that this guy is reaching for the gun" and that it did not support claims Brown was shot while running away from Wilson, or with his hands up."
Which right-wing rag did you read that in? All the witnesses say Brown ran from the car and the policeman got out shooting -- and kept shooting after Brown raised his hands and went to his knees. I know it upsets you right-wingers that some of us don't think the police should shoot unarmed people, but this is the most blatant case of police murder I've ever seen.
ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.
Thank you for your recent polls, they cheer me up immensely. All the indicators are that the Dems will be slaughtered in November - oh dear, what a pity, never mind!
ReplyDeleteOff topic, suddenly you don't seem to have much to say about the Ferguson shooting. Perhaps because all the initial reports are now being shown up as the crude, dishonest, Sharpton-style 'agit-prop' everyone with more than three brain cells suspected they were. I suspect that the grand jury will concur!
1. I think the Democrats will have a good night on election day.
ReplyDelete2. There's no much more to say about Ferguson. It was a police murder followed by a military-style police repression. That is obvious to anyone who honestly looks at the facts.
3. Will the policeman get off? Probably. He was White and his victim was Black, and juries in America have a hard time believing any white policeman can be wrong (especially if the victim is a Black man). It's not right, but there's still a LOT of racism in this country.
"Dr. Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist in San Francisco who also reviewed the documents, concurred that the autopsy “supports the fact that this guy is reaching for the gun" and that it did not support claims Brown was shot while running away from Wilson, or with his hands up."
ReplyDeleteWhich right-wing rag did you read that in? All the witnesses say Brown ran from the car and the policeman got out shooting -- and kept shooting after Brown raised his hands and went to his knees. I know it upsets you right-wingers that some of us don't think the police should shoot unarmed people, but this is the most blatant case of police murder I've ever seen.
ReplyDelete