Showing posts with label Elon Musk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Elon Musk. Show all posts

Friday, June 12, 2026

Is Musk's Space X I.P.O. The Universe's Biggest Ponzi Scheme?


The following post is by former Labor Secretary Robert Reich:

Elon Musk’s SpaceX goes on the market tomorrow. Rather than provide a range and then price the deal based on demand, as is customary in Initial Public Offerings, Musk has set a take-it-or-leave-it price of $135 per share. 


He anticipates that the resulting corporation will be valued at $1.77 trillion. That’s an extraordinary amount for a company that generated $18.7 billion in revenue last year and recorded an operating loss of $4.2 billion. 


In other words, Musk is offering SpaceX stock at roughly 100 times the company’s total revenue in 2025. This is ballsy, to say the least, given SpaceX’s consistent negative profitability and its failure to meet prior goals. But it’s a great deal for Musk. He comes out of it with nearly a trillion dollars. 


Granted, it’s difficult to predict the value of activities that don’t yet exist, such as SpaceX’s stated mission to “extend the light of consciousness to the stars.” Interstellar space travel and interplanetary habitation are inherently speculative endeavors. But before tomorrow’s giant I.P.O., capitalism had never before put a price tag on something nearly as speculative and as large.

 

Let’s be clear. SpaceX’s IPO is basically nothing more than a show of faith in Musk. After all, much of SpaceX’s value comes out of a deal Musk negotiated between Space X’s and his Artificial Intelligence startup, xAI. Musk essentially made that deal with himself, setting the relative valuations by himself, closing the deal by himself, and unilaterally deciding the value of his own transaction. A magic trick, out of thin air!

 

The closer you look at the SpaceX IPO, the more it looks like Musk’s ill-fated DOGE. It also bears a striking resemblance to Trump’s takeover of the U.S. government. All of it is arbitrary, based on the will of one man with a giant ego and an insatiable thirst for money and power. It’s built on self-dealing. There’s no accountability. No checks. No balances. 

Musk will have total control. Shareholders won’t have any voice whatsoever. Each share held by Musk will have ten times the voting power of a share offered to the public. 


SpaceX’s board of directors will engage in a pantomime. They’ll have no meaningful authority. As the editorial board of the Financial Times put it, “traditional governance checks are almost entirely absent…. [Musk] will have a virtually unchallenged grip on voting rights and the board.”


None of this would be particular cause for concern if investors could decide for themselves whether the downside risks and potential upside gains from buying SpaceX stock were worth the price. That’s called a “market.” Caveat emptor. 


But many of us, if not most of us, with any savings parked in major stock indices (yours truly included) won’t have any choice. We’re going to end up investing in SpaceX whether we want to or not. That’s because the major indices have been rigged. 


Normally, major stock indices have a waiting period before they plow their investor’s money into a newly-formed company. in order to test whether that company is worth it. But SpaceX has lobbied index funds to change the rules. 


On May 1, for example, the Nasdaq 100 implemented a new “fast entry” rule that will include companies valued among the top 40 most highly-valued companies — which will almost certainly include SpaceX.


Presto! A big chunk of American’s retirement savings and pensions will automaticallybe tied to SpaceX’s market value. At the same time, all that automatic infusion of investment will artificially jack up the value of SpaceX, at least in the short term.

 

But here’s the real kicker. SpaceX insiders — such as Musk and, reportedly, senior Trump officials — will be able to sell their shares sooner than is usually the case with an I.P.O., because that’s the way the I.P.O. has been organized. Which means they can enjoy the stocks’ upward tide as the major indices force millions of investors to buy it, and then they can exit SpaceX before the tide goes out. 


If this sounds to you like a Ponzi scheme, it does to me, too. Even worse, it’s a Ponzi scheme that’s been rigged by Musk, with the acquiescence of Trump’s Securities and Exchange Commission, to require that I and probably you put some of our savings into SpaceX. 


Speaking of the S.E.C, Senator Elizabeth Warren has raised many of these concerns with Paul Atkins, Trump’s S.E.C. chair. She’s even asked him to delay the I.P.O to determine whether index funds are adequately protecting investors — warning of “a disastrous scenario where retirees’ and families’ investment accounts take a hit if SpaceX’s valuation falters, with little recourse for any corporate misconduct, while the wealthiest man on earth becomes even wealthier due to a lack of oversight.”


But SpaceX’s takeoff is happening tomorrow, regardless. It’s likely to make Musk a trillionaire, but also shaft a lot of innocent people, perhaps without them even noticing. It will be a huge redistribution from most of us to Elon and his buddies. 

I don’t want to sound cynical, but this is the sort of thing that brings out the cynicism in me. It’s the story of American capitalism in this Second Gilded Age. 

Monday, July 07, 2025

Musk Creates A New Political Party (That's Destined To Fail)


After the Republicans passed their big ugly bill, Elon Musk was upset - so upset that he says he has created a new political party. He's calling it the American Party.

He thinks he can get Americans to support a new party because the public is currently upset with both the Republican and Democratic Parties. Both parties are underwater in the polls. In addition, Musk has a huge amount of money he could spend to support his new party.

But it takes more than money to get votes. You must have beliefs and ideas that the voters like. We learned this in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election. Musk sunk millions into supporting the Republican candidate - only to have that candidate go down in a crushing defeat.

Musk says his new party will give freedom to the people. What kind of freedom? He didn't oppose the GOP bill because it hurt many Americans. He opposed it because it didn't cut enough. He didn't like the significant increase to the national debt

Here are some of my reasons for doubting Musk will have any kind of success with his new party:

The United States already has multiple political parties. There is the Green Party, the Libertarian Party, and several other tiny parties. None of them has been able to generate enough support to make an impact on the political system. There is no reason to believe Musk's party will be different.

Americans don't like Musk. Poll after poll show he is one of the least liked individuals in the country. Voters saw what he did when given a little political power. He decimated many government agencies, making it harder for them to provide the services people expect from them. That was not received well by the public.

Musk has no new ideas on how to make like better for ordinary Americans. He simply wants to be able to protect his businesses (especially regarding the huge government contracts they have). 

MAGA supporters won't vote for Musk's party because he has dissed their favorite authoritarian demagogue. Those opposing Trump won't support Musk party because they are afraid doing that will allow Trump Republicans to retain power.

There really isn't a huge portion of the voters that are looking for a new party. Most are either Trump supporters or Trump haters. And like it or not, the 2026 election is going to be a referendum on Trump's policies. 

Musk thinks his enormous wealth gives him political power. It does allow him to be loud, but being loud doesn't necessarily translate into winning elections. He's sailing toward the biggest disappointment in his life.

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

Strong Plurality Supports Terminating Musk's Government Subsidies And Contracts

 

The chart above reflects the results of the Economist / YouGov Poll -- done between June 6th and 9th of a nationwide sample of 1,533 adults (including 1,397 registered voters). The margin of error is 3.5 points for adults and 3.2 points for registered voters.

Monday, June 09, 2025

A Warning For Democrats - Elon Musk Is NOT Your Friend!


I don't think any thinking people are surprised at the break-up of the Trump-Musk bromance (although some of us thought it might take a little longer than it did). Or that the break-up is as nasty as it is. After all, these men are both narcissists who both think they are always right (and deserve to be able to buy whatever they want). 

It has gotten so bad that Musk has threatened to start a new political party or support Democrats against Republicans in next year's election. I don't think the new party idea is viable. Musk is not nearly as popular as he seems to think he is. But the idea of Musk supporting Democrats is scary - especially to Democrats.

Let me be very clear in my advice to current and prospective Democratic office holders.

ELON MUSK IS NOT YOUR FRIEND! And neither is his money.

Thanks to his actions in the last few months, Musk has become toxic for most voters. He has seriously damaged many agencies in the government - to the extent that they are now struggling to meet their responsibilities to U.S. citizens. 

His opposition to the GOP's "big beautiful bill" is not because of its damaging cuts to services needed by millions of Americans. It's because he doesn't think those cuts are large enough. 

He still opposes moves that would actually help working people - like raising wages, making it easier to start and join a labor union, helping to pay the cost of child care, etc.

He is a racist who wants to preserve the white patriarchy.

He is corrupt. He tried to use his position at the White House to preserve and extend his government contracts - and he used it to try and force other countries to buy his Starlink system.

Any Democrat who accepts Musk's help in his/her campaign - or who just accepts money from the billionaire - risks tainting their own reputation with the Musk toxicity. 

If Musk donates to a Democratic campaign, the campaign should return and publicly rebuke that donation. And the same goes for PACs and superPACs. They should refuse any and all Musk donations.

There is an old saying - The enemy of my enemy is my friend. That does not apply in this case, because embracing Musk would be perceived as embracing his ideas and beliefs - most of which are anathema to Democratic ideals.

And don't take sides in the Musk / Trump feud. It is evil corruption versus evil corruption. Democrats must oppose both.

The task for Democrats in the next election is to restore the belief that they support working men and women and support policies that will help them. Embracing a billionaire and/or accepting his money promotes the opposite perception.

Democrats don't need Musk or his money. What they do need is to reject him. That would be the ethical and politically smart thing to do.

Saturday, June 07, 2025

The Bromance Is Over (And The Breakup Is Very Nasty)


The following post is by Robert Reich:

I’m trying not to be too delighted about the new reality TV show starring Elon and Donald, but the dialogue is truly extraordinary (I’m quoting them verbatim but putting their volley in what appears to be its intended order).


ELON (February 7, 2025): “I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man.”


ELON (June 3, 2025, four days after leaving the Trump regime): “[Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill is a] disgusting abomination” and “shame on those who voted for it” and “In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people”


DONALD (June 5, 2025): “You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval desk. Even with a black eye. I said, do you want a little makeup? He said, no, I don’t think so. Which is interesting, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will any more.”


ELON (June 5, 2025): “Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. … Such ingratitude.


DONALD: “Elon was ‘wearing thin,’ I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!”


ELON: “Such an obvious lie. So sad. … This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!”


ELON (in response to a Musk supporter who calls for Trump to be impeached): “Yes.”


DONALD: “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!”


ELON: “In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.”


DONALD: “Elon is suffering from Trump derangement syndrome.”


ELON: “Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! … Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.”


ELON: [Reposts video of Trump partying with Epstein in 1992 with a “hmm” emoji.]


ELON [Posts a poll and asks]: “Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?”

ELON: “The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year.”

I’ve been predicting the divorce for six months. It was inevitable. Both have massive egos and insatiable needs for money, power, and attention. 


I’m not a psychoanalyst, but both had abusive fathers who humiliated them — and I suspect that this contributed to their cruelty. Both turned their rage on the U.S. government and many people dependent on it. And in just a few months they destroyed institutions that had been built over decades or more. 


Now, they’re turning their rage on each other. 


It’s mutual destruction. Tesla’s market value has fallen 17 percent since the outbreak of hostilities. I assume Trump’s polls are showing similar declines. 


Other than their pathological narcissism, the other similarity between Musk and Trump is that both have grown far richer since Election Day by using the government to pad their pockets. 


Trump’s corruption has been well documented. Musk’s corruption isn’t far behind: His net worth has increased by more than $100 billion since Election Day. A new reportfrom the staff of Senator Elizabeth Warren shows in remarkable detail how Musk used the U.S. government for personal gain. Musk has also scraped up more government data about every American and much of the rest of the world’s people than any other person controls. 


The biggest difference between them? Trump values loyalty above all other attributes. Musk values disruption above all else.

 

The end of their storied bromance raises two questions:

 

1. Does Trump’s anger over Musk’s disloyalty toward him exceed Musk’s delight in disrupting Trump’s signature goals? 

2. How much will they destroy each other in the process? 



Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Trump Enables Musk Conflicts Of Interest And Endangers Public Identity Theft

 

This is from the Economic Policy Institute.

Summary: 

  • By removing certain ethical requirements for civil servants, appointing billionaire Elon Musk as a “special government employee,” and granting DOGE unprecedented access to sensitive government data, Trump has created multiple avenues for Musk and his team to exploit their political positions for their own personal gain.
  • There is no evidence of Musk filing ethics forms or addressing any potential conflicts of interest since his appointment as a civil servant. Trump said that Musk will identify his own conflicts, which is in and of itself a conflict.
  • Musk and DOGE team members—who are working in government despite having clear private sector interests—now have unprecedented access to nonpublic data that is highly valued in the burgeoning data broker industry. Even if their data access yielded just 10% of the market insights provided by that data broker industry, it would be worth $43.4 billion.
  • If Musk leveraged his access and influence to double the value of federal contracts awarded to his companies, he would capture $23.6 billion in federal spending.
  • Musk and DOGE’s unrestrained and careless access to sensitive data like Social Security numbers will no doubt exacerbate the problem of identity theft in the United States. If current victimization rates doubled, identity theft would affect 50 million people and cost them $39.4 billion annually. 

    Conclusion

    Trump’s removal of certain ethical standards for federal service, his establishment of DOGE, and his appointment of Elon Musk as a special government employee have not only created opportunities for Musk and others to personally profit from public service, but have also increased the risks of U.S. individuals having their personal data mishandled or their identity stolen. Trump has allowed Musk and DOGE unprecedented access to personal and proprietary information across multiple federal agencies that could be enormously beneficial to Musk’s business dealings.

    Elon Musk, as a special government employee, should have filed multiple ethics forms, received briefings, and worked to address all conflicts, whether by recusing himself or divesting from certain assets. Instead, Trump stated that Musk will identify his own conflicts—a conflict of interest, in and of itself—and there is no evidence from the White House that he has filed any ethics forms. Further, Congressional Republicans have blocked attempts for oversight of DOGE and Musk (Nihill 2025). The guardrails that are usually in place to protect the public from compromised government decision-makers have been removed or disregarded to allow the richest man in the history of the world to influence U.S. government policy. All of this while Musk could potentially profit from access to personal data and federal contracts and potentially cost working people in the U.S. $39.4 billion annually in personal losses related to identity theft if data is mishandled.

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Musk/DOGE May Be Costing As Much As It Saves

 

The following is part of an article by Zeeshan Aleem at MSNBC:

We’ve watched as DOGE chief Elon Musk’s promised pot of savings from his “efficiency” operation has shrunk from $2 trillion to $1 trillion to what he now claims is $150 billion, or 7.5% the amount initially promised. Now new estimates suggest that the way Musk has gone about his cost-cutting crusade might cost nearly as much as — if not more — than what he claims to have saved taxpayers.

As The New York Times reports, DOGE hasn’t been cheap for the federal government:

The Partnership for Public Service, a nonprofit organization that studies the federal work force, has used budget figures to produce a rough estimate that firings, re-hirings, lost productivity, and paid leave of thousands of workers will cost upward of $135 billion this fiscal year. At the Internal Revenue Service, a DOGE-driven exodus of 22,000 employees would cost about $8.5 billion in revenue in 2026 alone, according to figures from the Budget Lab at Yale University.

Put those two figures together and you’re approaching $145 billion in costs. And that’s not counting, as the Times notes, the legal fees the federal government is incurring to defend against dozens of lawsuits contesting DOGE’s authority. . . .

The estimates raise serious questions about DOGE's net savings — and that’s assuming Musk’s quoted savings numbers are reliable, which they often haven’t been. Moreover, the estimated lost revenue from the IRS cuts would be a recurring phenomenon. Musk’s degrading of the administrative state and social services while potentially saving nothing helps underscore how scammy the DOGE enterprise, and sheds light on how this whole operation is at its core not about fiscal discipline.

Musk and his team were perversely creative in devising ways to fire workers en masse. But as a group of cocky political outsiders who confused speed with efficiency, they weren’t equipped to anticipate the legal restrictions on what they could do. Their rash approach has resulted in lots of rehiring and back pay for people wrongly fired — and lost productivity along the way. Musk and his team put their faith in a kind of “shoot first, ask questions later” strategy, but that resulted in administrative whiplash. “Accidentally” canceled programs have had to be re-assembled. And blanket firings of “probationary workers” resulted in the squandering of expensive hiring and training processes for hyperspecialized positions that could cost up to $1 million for positions like spies, the Times notes.There is a possibility that Musk is delivering the opposite of taxpayer savings — a worse government at roughly the same cost.Social Security is under siege, foreign aid has been eviscerated, and the IRS is less equipped to stop tax cheats (which in turn means less government revenue). But, according to the estimates reported by the Times, no significant sum of money is being saved, and there’s no way the “savings” from what we’ve seen so far will net out to massive “DOGE checks” for the American public.

Thursday, April 17, 2025

Poll Numbers For Trump, Vance, And Musk Are Not Good


 




The charts above reflects the results of the Economist / YouGov Poll -- done between April 13th and 15th of a nationwide sample of 1,512 adults (including 1,329 registered voters). The margin of error is 3.4 points for adults and 3.3 points for registered voters.

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Trump And Musk Are Making It Easier For The Rich To Evade Paying Taxes

 

The following is part of an excellent post by economist Paul Krugman:

 All good Americans will pay the taxes they owe. Not so good Americans, on the other hand, will pay less than they owe, hoping to get away with it. And their odds of getting away with tax evasion this year are a lot higher than they were last year, thanks to Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

While we won’t have hard numbers for some time, it now seems likely that the “tax gap” — the difference between what taxpayers owe and what they actually pay — will surge by hundreds of billions of dollars. Why? Because tax cheaters believe that the I.R.S., devastated by DOGE-directed layoffs, will lack the resources to detect and crack down on tax fraud. . . .

One agency that has been singled out for especially severe cuts is the Internal Revenue Service, which has already laid off thousands of employees. And that’s just the beginning: The Trump administration is reportedly seeking to cut the IRS work force in half. This would cripple the agency’s ability to conduct audits and discover fraud.

And preliminary indications are that widespread belief that a damaged IRS won’t be able to police tax evasion is already undermining federal revenue.


Last month the Washington Post reported that

Senior tax officials are bracing for a sharp drop in revenue collected this spring, as an increasing number of individuals and businesses spurn filing their taxes or attempt to skip paying balances owed to the Internal Revenue Service, according to three people with knowledge of tax projections.

Treasury Department and IRS officials are predicting a decrease of more than 10 percent in tax receipts by the April 15 deadline compared with 2024, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share nonpublic data. That would amount to more than $500 billion in lost federal revenue.

That’s a gigantic number. If it’s right, surging tax evasion may do as much or more to add to the national debt as the huge tax cuts Republicans are trying to ram through Congress. . . .


Who will benefit from what looks like a deliberate attempt to make America safe for tax evaders?


Historically the tax gap has been concentrated among high-income individuals, for two reasons. First, ordinary workers get most of their income in the form of wages and salaries, which are reported by their employers, while wealthy people often own businesses or, at the highest levels, can afford to engage in sophisticated schemes, for example using offshore accounts, to hide their income. Second, the income tax is progressive, so a dollar of income concealed by a high earner costs a lot more revenue than a dollar not reported lower down the scale.


In other words, crippling tax enforcement is a stealth giveaway to the 1 percent.

And within the 1 percent, the gains will go to the unscrupulous — wealthy individuals who don’t feel any sense of civic duty and don’t care about the effects on their reputations if they’re caught.


I’d argue that this means that lax tax collection has a moral as well as a financial cost, because it specifically rewards bad behavior. It takes us down the road toward a society where anyone who plays by the rules is a chump — a Leona Helmsley society in which only the little people pay taxes.


Not that pointing this out would deter Trump and Musk. After all, wealthy tax evaders are their kind of people.