Showing posts with label Arkansas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arkansas. Show all posts

Sunday, March 19, 2023

Protecting Children By Putting Them To Work (Satire)


The state of Arkansas has passed a law loosening the restrictions on child labor. In a brilliant bit of satire for The Washington Post, Alexandra Petri pokes fun at the crazy Arkansas law. 

I care a great deal about the children. That is why I am proud to announce that we are rolling back child labor laws. We cannot sit by and let people who would squander our most precious resource, our children, by forcing them to waste time sitting in libraries and enjoying story hours, when they could be operating heavy machinery for low pay.

We must protect the children from the greatest threat they face: gun violence idleness. For too long, they have been coddled, giving nothing to society other than colds, items that are sticky for unclear reasons, and bad, nonrepresentative drawings that suggest their parents are the same height as their homes. No longer. Now, they will be given an opportunity long denied them: the opportunity to work hard, long, unregulated hours! As I have always said, we must stop trapping children in failing schools. Take them out of those schools and make them work for wages!

If there is one thing I know about children, it is that they love to operate machinery, and they would operate more if we did not keep stopping them. Yet, instead of harnessing their natural inclination toward electrical outlets, power tools and sharp objects generally, we waste all that potential — child-proofing our homes, covering the outlets and hiding the electric drills. What a loss for society! What a senseless waste of natural ability!

Give a child a model backhoe and she will clap her plump hands together with delight and cry, “Dada! Dada!” Well, how much more would the child enjoy operating an actual backhoe? THIS MUCH. (Imagine that I am holding my hands out very big.) Think of all the time children waste in fake kitchens, preparing plastic meals in nonfunctional ovens, when they could be working on actual production lines, packaging real meat and processing real dairy! I am glad to see that some lucky newcomers already are! But we cannot stop with them. We must not rest until every child has the same opportunities.

Every child sitting in a library — or having a book read to them by anyone, in drag or not — is a societal failure. I feel the same way about it as I feel when I see a book generally: enraged, and confused.

I care about the children, just as I care about our old-growth forests: They are a valuable resource that should be harvested for money. I am glad to see burgeoning bipartisan agreement on this point. Children have been spoiled for too long. It is time they worked — like everyone else.

This is why it so upsets me to see a child reading the Upton Sinclair classic, “The Jungle.” One: a child is reading a book (dangerous, bad, why is child not working?) and two, the “Jungle” negatively portrays children working in meat production.

How dare these children, with their small, nimble fingers, fritter away even a moment that they could be spending sweeping a chimney or, perhaps, working in a coal mine? If minors weren’t supposed to be mining, why is it right there in the name? There are only so many hours in the day, and every hour children spend in a library being exposed to ideas, or playing (even if they are playing at farming, a noble trade), or singing a little song to themselves just for fun, or making friends, or laughing because someone is wearing a silly hat, is an hour they will not be able to receive extremely low wages for doing a dangerous task. How sad. Our children are a valuable resource. We must protect them, at all costs.

What good is a nation that cannot protect its children?

Thursday, February 13, 2020

Michael Bloomberg Wins His First State Poll


Can Michael Bloomberg emerge as the moderate alternative to Bernie Sanders? After the poor showing of Joe Biden in Iowa and New Hampshire, that has become a valid question. Especially since Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar have, so far, not polled well in the coming states (like the 14 Super Tuesday states).

If this poll is correct, then Bloomberg might actually become a major player after Super Tuesday. It marks the first time that Bloomberg has finished first in any state poll.

The chart above reflects the results of the Talk Business & Politics / Hendrix College Poll -- done on February 6th and 7th of 496 likely Democratic primary voters in Arkansas, with a 4.3 point margin of error.

NOTE -- Arkansas is a Super Tuesday state, and will vote on March 3rd.

Thursday, September 22, 2016

Democrats Need To Put More Emphasis On Senate Races


The chart above shows the poll averages (from RealClearPolitics) in 12 states with a Republican senator up for re-election this year. The Democrats need to take five of these seats to once again control the U.S. Senate.

Currently, Democrats have a significant lead in two of those races -- Wisconsin and Illinois. They are close in four other states, with some polls showing them leading and some showing them behind -- Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Nevada. The other six races seem to be favoring Republicans rather significantly right now --Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Georgia, Kansas, and Arkansas.

If Hillary Clinton is elected, and I think she will be, she is going to need the Senate to be controlled by Democrats. Without that, she won't be able to do much. The Republicans will just do four years of obstructing anything she tries to do (just like they have done for the last few years to President Obama).

It seems obvious to me that the Democrats need to put more emphasis on many of these Senate seats.

Tuesday, March 01, 2016

Super Tuesday Chances And Predictions From Nate Silver

(The photo above of Clinton/Sanders is from leftfootforward.org.)

Today is Super Tuesday, and 11 states will go to the polls to choose their preference for the Democratic presidential nominee. America's best poll analyst, Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com, has released his chances of winning and predictions of voting percentages for nine of the Super Tuesday states. The other two (Colorado and Minnesota) have caucuses (which depend mostly on turnout, and not the will of most people). Mr. Silver says:

ALABAMA

Chance of winning
Clinton...............99%
Sanders...............1%

Prediction
Clinton...............73.6%
Sanders...............23.5%

ARKANSAS

Chance of winning
Clinton...............98%
Sanders...............2%

Prediction
Clinton...............64.1%
Sanders...............32.5%

GEORGIA

Chance of winning
Clinton...............99%
Sanders...............1%

Prediction
Clinton...............69.9%
Sanders...............26.9%

MASSACHUSETTS

Chance of winning
Clinton...............87%
Sanders...............13%

Prediction
Clinton...............51.7%
Sanders...............45.2%

OKLAHOMA

Chance of winning
Clinton...............17%
Sanders...............83%

Prediction
Clinton...............45.1%
Sanders...............51.5%

TENNESSEE

Chance of winning
Clinton...............99%
Sanders...............1%

Prediction
Clinton...............64.9%
Sanders...............31.8%

TEXAS

Chance of winning
Clinton...............99%
Sanders...............1%

Prediction
Clinton...............65.2%
Sanders...............31.9%

VERMONT

Chance of winning
Clinton...............1%
Sanders...............99%

Prediction
Clinton...............10.8%
Sanders...............86.9%

VIRGINIA

Chance of winning
Clinton...............99%
Sanders...............1%

Prediction
Clinton...............62.5%
Sanders...............34.5%

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Arkansas, Michigan & N. Carolina Strong For Clinton


Now that voters in Iowa and New Hampshire have made their decision, we move on to other states -- and three of those states voting in the next month are Arkansas (on March 1st), Michigan (on March 8th), and North Carolina (on March 15th). Hillary Clinton still looks very strong in those three states -- leading Sanders by 32 points in Arkansas, by 32 points in Michigan, and by 26 points in North Carolina.

The Talk Business & Politics / Hendrix College Poll was done on February 4th of a random sample of 451 Arkansas Democrats, with a margin of error of 3.3 points.

The IMP/Target Insyght Poll was done between February 2nd and 4th of a random sample of 400 Michigan Democrats, and has a margin of error of 5 points.

The High Point University Poll was done between January 30th and February 4th of a random sample of 478 North Carolina Democrats, with a margin of error of 4.5 points.

Friday, April 10, 2015

American Public Doesn't Want Discrimination Against Gays


Right-wing Republicans have recently tried to appease the evangelicals in their base by passing some state laws to allow businesses to discriminate against the LGBT community. Indiana passed such a law, and there was such a huge backlash that the legislature and governor quickly amended the law to prevent that discrimination. In Arkansas, the governor refused to sign such a law until it was amended to prevent discrimination by businesses.

I think the legislators in both states were surprised by the outrage over these laws (even among the business community that normally supports Republicans) -- but they shouldn't have been. If they had been paying attention, instead of just trying to pander to their party's base, they would have known that this country has changed a lot in the last few years. Americans are no longer willing to accept discrimination against lesbians and gays.

The top chart shows that 60.3% say businesses shouldn't be allowed to discriminate, either in hiring or in who they will serve, because of religious reasons. This is from a new Reuters/Ipsos Poll -- done between April 6th and 8th of a random national sample of 892 adults, with a 3.7 point margin of error.

And that's not the only poll showing a significant majority of Americans disapprove of discrimination by businesses over religious reasons. The bottom chart shows an even slightly larger number in a new poll by NBC News. This one was done between April 6th and 8th of a random national sample of 2,052 adults, with a 3.5 point margin of error.

Americans believe in religious freedom, but they don't consider discrimination by a business to be religious freedom. They know what it is -- religious bigotry, and they don't like it.


Sunday, February 15, 2015

Right-Wing Still Refuses Equal Rights For LGBT Community


It is now becoming obvious that right-wing religious nuts, through their Republican elected officials, won't be able to prevent same-sex marriages anymore. But that doesn't mean they are ready to give members of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender) community rights equal to all other Americans. The map below shows the states where employers can't discriminate against members of the LGBT community. Note that less than half of all states not ban workplace discrimination, while some other ban it only for state employment.

But that doesn't mean the right is not trying to repeal the few rights in the workplace that the LGBT community currently has. Governor Brownback of Kansas just signed an executive order removing the right of Gays/lesbians in that state employed by the state. That means they can now be fired just for being homosexual. And Arkansas has gone further -- passing a bill that would deny its cities and counties from passing anti-discrimination laws. And these are not the only states -- many Republican states are currently introducing anti-homosexual laws.

The really crazy part of this is that the public opposes workplace discrimination much more than it supports same-sex marriage. Not the chart below (from a June YouGov Poll). Note that an overwhelming majority of Americans (76%) thinks it should be illegal for any employer (public or private) to fire a person for being LGBT. And this huge majority scans the demographic spectrum on sex, age, race, income, region, or political preference (including 71% in the red-state South, and 68% of Republicans).

The right-wing politicians may be pleasing a few fundamentalist teabaggers, but they are putting themselves in opposition to the vast majority of Americans. It seems like the Republican officials are going out of their way to make sure most Americans won't like them.



 LGBT employment discrimination law in the United States    Sexual orientation and gender identity: all employment    Sexual orientation: all employment    Sexual orientation and gender identity: state employment    Sexual orientation: state employment    No state-level protection for LGBT employees

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

More Polling On Senate Races


This is from a Public Policy Polling survey taken on September 18th and 19th of 652 likely New Hampshire voters, with a margin of error of about 4 points.


This is from a Public Policy Polling survey done on September 18th and 19th of 852 likely Michigan voters, with a margin of error of about 3.4 points.


This is from a High Point University Poll done between September 13th and 18th of 410 North Carolina voters, and has a margin of error of about 5 points.


This is from a Public Policy Polling survey done between September 18th and 21st of 880 likely Alaska voters, and has a margin of error of around 4 points.


This is from a Public Policy Polling survey done between September 18th and 21st of 1,453 likely Arkansas voters, with a 2.6 point margin of error.

Sunday, August 31, 2014

Senate Races In Arkansas And Michigan


Republicans thought they would have a pretty easy time taking the senate seat away from the Democrats in Arkansas. After all, Arkansas is a pretty red state. But the latest Rasmussen Poll (taken on August 25th and 26th of 750 likely Arkansas voters, with a margin of error of 4 points) shows this race has turned into a real dogfight. The race is currently a dead heat -- with 44% supporting Pryor (D) and 43% supporting Cotton (R). The Republicans could still win this seat, but I'm starting to think Pryor may actually hold on to it for the Democrats.

Meanwhile, a different poll shows the Democrats in good shape to win the open senate seat in Michigan. It is the EPIC-MRA Poll (taken between August 22nd and 25th of 600 likely Michigan voters, with a 4 point margin of error). That survey shows Democrat Gary Peters leading Republican Terri Lynn Land by a six point margin.