Saturday, November 23, 2013

Science Wins Texas School Book Battle

(This image of Charles Darwin is from the website of The Telegraph.)

This is the year that science school books had to be approved for Texas schools. But that approval had to be made by the conservative State Board of Education. It was feared that the Board would force book publishers to include creationist and anti-global warming ideas into those textbooks to please the religious right. Fortunately, the publishers stood firm this year, and refused to alter their books to replace real science with religion -- and yesterday, the State Board of Education finally gave in and approved the books as written. This is a big victory for science, and for all Texas school children.

Here is the press release issued by the Texas Freedom Network after the Board's vote to approve the textbooks:

November 22, 2013 
Despite last-minute efforts by some board members and political activists to derail the adoption of two textbooks, the State Board of Education today voted to adopt all of the proposed instructional materials up for adoption for high school biology and environmental science. Throughout the adoption process, publishers refused to make concessions that would have compromised science instruction on evolution and climate change in their textbooks, said Texas Freedom Network President Kathy Miller.
“It’s hard to overstate the importance of today’s vote, which is a huge win for science education and public school students in Texas,” Miller said. “Four years ago this board passed controversial curriculum standards some members hoped would force textbooks to water down instruction on evolution and climate change. But that strategy has failed because publishers refused to lie to students and parents demanded that their children get a 21st-century education based on established, mainstream science.”
The board voted to adopt all textbooks and instructional materials submitted by 14 publishers for high school biology and high school environmental science. None of those textbooks call into question the overwhelming evidence supporting evolution and climate change science.
The adoption of the Pearson biology textbook is contingent on the review by a panel of three science experts of factual “errors” alleged by an anti-evolution activist who served on the official state review team this summer. The publisher has insisted that the alleged errors are, in fact, accurate representations of established, mainstream science.
The board adopted the Houghton Mifflin Harcourt environmental science textbook after the publisher submitted a document agreeing to revise material that might be outdated. Scientists who have reviewed the publisher’s proposed revisions were satisfied that none of the revisions would compromise the integrity of the science in the textbook, Miller said.


  1. As far as I am aware, there is nothing religious in doubting the prognostications of those who promised global warming especially since it has been nearly 17 years since we had any! The objections arise because the, er, 'science' that 'supports' the notion is dodgier than one of my second-hand cars (back in the day!). Indeed, looking at the matter from a distance I would be more inclined to see religiosity amongst the 'warmers'!

    And as for 'Darwinism', one of its biggest doubters was, er, Charles Darwin! The 'new testament' version of his 'old testament' would have us believe that we are all totally controlled by little globules of protein. Well, I fyou believe that, can I interest you in a one lady owner, very low mileage Corvette?

  2. I should add that Darwin doubted parts of his theory because he was a truly great and proper scientist.

    1. All good scientists doubt their theories. It's why they go to such efforts to prove them by experimentation. It's only religious nuts that accept their beliefs on faith, with no proof.

      And you can keep that corvette. I never cared much for them.


ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.