Thursday, May 14, 2009

Obama Breaks his Promise

Even though Dick Cheney is running around denying it, we all now know that the Bush administration ordered the torturing of detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay. We have seen the "smoking gun" memos from the White House that proves it beyond a doubt.

The only thing left to decide was whether we would admit to the world that the Bush administration acted like war criminals and punish them for their actions. That is what should be done. That would be the morally correct thing to do.

But we learned early in the Obama administration that would not happen. Instead of allowing a full investigation to be conducted and charges brought against the criminals in the Bush administration, Obama decided to "look forward instead of back". That was a nice way of saying their would be no charges.

Obama had decided to do the politically expedient thing instead of the right thing. After getting taken to task for that, he later said it would be up to his Attorney general, but we all know the Attorney General is not going to do anything the president doesn't want him to do. The fact is that Obama has decided it might hurt him politically to do the right thing, so he's not going to do it.

Many of us had hoped that Obama would turn out to be a strong leader who was not afraid to do the right thing. That was probably a foolish hope. We now know he is the consummate political animal, and will do nothing that might hurt him politically -- no matter how right it might be.

But even if the war criminals would never be charged, they could be exposed before the world by releasing the pictures of their heinous actions. Releasing the pictures and exposing their actions would show the world the United States has changed and will not condone torture -- even if it is ordered by the White House.

Obama had promised that he would release the pictures. He even had a judicial order for the release to cover his political self. But he evidently lied to us, because now he is saying he will fight against releasing the pictures. He said the release of the pictures would make it more dangerous for our soldiers, even though he says the photos "are not particularly sensational, especially when compared with the painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib."

If the pictures are not that bad, then why not release them? It makes it look like we are not only protecting the criminals responsible for the torture, but we are now also trying to hide what they did. Lying and hiding the truth is what puts our soldiers in danger, because it makes it look like the United States is not willing to change its criminal policies. By not making a clean break with the past administration, the Obama administration looks like it condones what the past administration did.

It's too bad that Obama has turned out to be a politician rather than a leader, and it doesn't bode well for the future of our country. What will he cave in on next -- health care or energy policy? Who knows?

7 comments:

  1. This continuing unjustifiable war is producing the stress on our own that amounts to torture as well. Maybe pictures of our own troops cracking should be published, that would keep the terraists happy.

    One of our hometown boys just went bonkers, doesn't three deployments amount to torture as well?

    (see the cab)

    ReplyDelete
  2. This (torture pictures) decision is disappointing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When I first read that President Obama wasn't going to release "the photos," I thought he was talking about the ones of Air Force One scaring the bejeebies out of all those people in Manhattan.

    "He said the release of the pictures would make it more dangerous for our soldiers, even though he says the photos 'are not particularly sensational, especially when compared with the painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib.'"

    Most people didn't find the Danish cartoons particularly sensational either, but that didn't stop the jihadists from rioting. Even the false rumor of a copy of the Koran being flushed down a toilet at Guantanamo led to riots in which 15 people were killed.

    If the people who are responsible have been punished, and the photos aren't that bad, what earthly purpose would releasing them serve, other than to further embarrass the Bush Administration?

    I guess the prurient interest that some people have in these photos outweighs the safety of the troops.

    Give it a rest, jobsanger. Our President did the right thing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. CT-
    The problem is that the people responsible have NOT been punished.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ruth-
    I agree that three deployments in an unnecessary war is torture.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "The problem is that the people responsible have NOT been punished."

    Assuming for a moment that's true, they should be tried in either a court martial or a civilian court, depending on their military status at the time of the alleged crime.

    Trying them in the court of public opinion might provide you a degree of satisfaction, and it certainly won't hurt viewership on certain cable news networks, but it can also be used by the defendants to claim that their cases have been unduly prejudiced by all the publicity.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I would be happy for the people responsible (Bush, Cheney, Rice, Ashcroft, Gonzales) to be tried in ANY court.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED. And neither will racist,homophobic, or misogynistic comments. I do not mind if you disagree, but make your case in a decent manner.